MEGAN FOX DROPPED from Transformers 3.....
- Thread starter niennumb1
- Start date
I don't know. At least Transmorphers has a married lesbian couple. I'd rather have that than Megan Fox being mooched all over by Shia LaBugFudge.
And I do LOVE how the writers of the first movie thought that a subplot involving Sam working up the courage to tell her character that he loves her was given so much screen time and had so much emphasis that now when he's getting a new girlfriend, it's now rendered entirely pointless.
:lol
What I actually find REALLY funny that no one has
commented on is the same thing as her " CO-STAR "
in the movie....
Here you have two young people , not been around the
Hollywood block for too long shooting their mouths off
slamming others in Hollywierd... :lol
It just makes me laugh that back in the day REAL
actors and actress's would NEVER start S#$T like that
in public but these " WERE ALL THAT " kids today have no
problem with it...
:rolleyes
commented on is the same thing as her " CO-STAR "
in the movie....
Here you have two young people , not been around the
Hollywood block for too long shooting their mouths off
slamming others in Hollywierd... :lol
It just makes me laugh that back in the day REAL
actors and actress's would NEVER start S#$T like that
in public but these " WERE ALL THAT " kids today have no
problem with it...
:rolleyes
PHArchivist
Master Member
The difference between Bay and Cameron is that Cameron is a d***head when he doesn't get what he wants or his crew can't keep up. But when he gets what he wants, he puts Academy-award winning material on the screen.
Bay on the other hand is a d***head because he's a d**ass who thinks that the way to make good movies is to BE a d***head. But when his crew buckles to his infantile tantrums, he still puts crap up on the screen.
In otherwords Michael Bay is a Jim Cameron Wannabe, with a grossly misinterpreted perspective.
ItsThatGuy
Sr Member
She doesn't fill seats in the first place. She isn't bad on the eyes, but that doesn't help her acting at all. I hate seeing actors getting swapped for someone else, but I could care less either way - mainly because these Transformer movies are quite terrible.
cayman shen
Master Member
I dig skank, but she'd have to be sitting beside me in the theater with her hand in my knickers before I'd sit through another Transformers movie. And even then, I'd resent it.
PHArchivist
Master Member
That's ok... They can all hang out with Crispin Glover, and wait for a huge movie hit to bouy their eventual comeback (you know, like Charlie's Angels Full Throttle!).
Don't you have a hot young wife to do that?
Qui-Gonzalez
Master Member
Dude, if I want porn, I will watch porn. I still don't care for the chick.
Solo, you are dead on. Bay will never get another dime of mine. He got me with Transformers 2, but not again. Baysplosions.
Solo4114
Master Member
"Turn her away" in what sense?
Because...
...I tend to agree with this. For me, she just comes across as plastic, rather than actually hot. Not to mention that she really does look kinda bitchy. It's her eyes and her facial expressions, you see. Every time I see her in pictures and such, she exudes ZERO warmth. I don't mean "warmth" in the sense of "nurturing" or whatever, I mean warmth in the sense of "like something other than an android or blow-up doll." Her eyes...they're dead. Just...dead. Empty. Nothing going on there. I don't mean "stupid" either. I mean...empty. Cold. Uninviting. No passion.
Her "come hither" look is non-existent. She poses. Not the same thing. Other women have a "come hither" look that really makes me want to "go thither." But this girl:
...just doesn't seem to be there. Like I said, no warmth to her. Nothing welcoming, nothing beckoning. Just a pose. An empty pose with empty eyes.
Even this picture:
...which is, admittedly, better, still seems....like she isn't there. She might as well be a robot. And to me, that's not sexy at all.
Other women, even when they pose, exude sexiness. Megan Fox exudes plasticity.
It's not even the "skank" factor, either. There are plenty of porn stars who can come across as skanks but still be sexy in a weird way. Not Megan Fox, though. Not for me, at least. Bedding her -- or rather, bedding her public persona -- would be like getting it on with an animatronic "Real Doll." Tonight on HBO's Real Sex -- Megan Fox!
Would I turn her down?
Hmm...I honestly don't know. I'd turn down her public face, definitely. That may have nothing to do with Megan Fox the person, of course, but her public persona just does NOTHING for me, and that makes me think the sex would be lousy.
If you mean "you wouldn't turn down dating her", oh, I most certainly would (again, based on her public persona). She might be worth going out to dinner with...actually, scratch that. Drinks. I don't want to foot the bill for her meal. She might have some interesting stories, but I have a feeling I'd get bored or annoyed with her after a while.
firesprite
Master Member
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight... Not buying that. That's always the line that actors who get dropped from films give.
IEDBOUNTYHUNTER
Sr Member
I agree.
Too Much Garlic
Master Member
I wouldn't... make a completely ridiculous post saying I wouldn't.
There, there. :lol
Solo4114
Master Member
If we're talking just about sex here, for me, there's gotta be something beyond mere eye candy involved. The woman has to have an air of passion about her. She's gotta seem into it and she has to seem genuine. Megan Fox doesn't come across as genuine to me. She comes across as a construct -- not even a real person. Like I said, an animatronic "Real Doll."
If that's what runs your engine, hey, groovy. You can have her. Not me, though.
If that's what runs your engine, hey, groovy. You can have her. Not me, though.
Qui-Gonzalez
Master Member
So, you think she is an eye-candy starfish?
cayman shen
Master Member
Wow...I'm always shocked when anyone online remembers anything I say! Yes, the lil lady would object. :lol
Yes. Well said.
What Solo said; that's exactly the impression I get too. Nothing going on.
I like brunettes and I do think Fox is attractive in a kind of clinical sense. Like Jennifer Connolly with her soul sucked out, or something.
Hot is nice, but useless in and of itself. Hot plus responsive and involved is my ideal. I just can't picture Fox being either of those.
PHArchivist
Master Member
Darklighter
Sr Member
You guys make me sick. I would do terrible unforgivable things with Miss Fox. :cool
Similar threads
