Don: I do applaud you for reaching your correct final opinion regarding the authenticity of the phaser; and I concur that it is very appropriate to heavily scrutinize auction house offerings - especially on high end items such as this - but to do so while simultaneously hurtling mean-spirited insults and attempting to tarnish reputations in the process is truly distasteful and unworthy conduct, IMO, that can only undermine your own credibility as opposed to that of your targets. I can't help but believe that you are being intellectually dishonest in the way you portray the Profiles description as asserting on-screen usage of the phaser in four specific TOS episodes; which it clearly does not. No one else at all has misinterpreted the write up the way you portray it; but many have applauded the level of detailed, comprehensive analysis contained in the description that genuinely attempts to provide the reader with meaningful evidence of authenticity for the prop. When in the past have you ever seen a single, let alone multiple, composite images contained in a major auction house catalog that shows the prop for sale side-by-side with a similarly positioned screenshot from a relevant episode filled with annotations about matching geometry and matching unique scratches, paint blemishes, etc? Yet you attempt to assign a malicious and dishonest intent to the auction house for presenting the write up - by unfairly twisting the information presented therein. I have no doubt whatsoever that PIH would have rejected the phaser for consignment if they honestly felt it was not genuine; and that they are not the solely profit driven entity you portray them as with little or no concern for integrity. You should applaud the effort to present meaningful evidence of authenticity in the catalog, IMO. I believe this is the first time that a TOS phaser pistol which has been screen matched to an episode (Assignment: Earth) has ever been offered at auction - and it should definitely not be an occasion to chastise the auction house. I must say that I do agree that in general all auction houses should try to continuously enhance their prescreening / investigative measures on incoming consigned memorabilia - though logistically in a sale involving hundreds or more items I can see how it might be difficult to devote sufficient time and attention to every piece. Also, if a consignor is able to present an auction house with high integrity authenticating information - which is of course always subject to scrutiny by other informed analysts - that should not be considered inappropriate. The excellent screen-matching work you performed in the past on one of your Scotty Maroon jackets - I believe - to some PR photos - would be invaluable inclusions to a catalog description if you ever consigned that costume to auction, IMO. Your article reviewing this phaser offering - filled with so much malice and unfair commentary that fools no serious readers - fails miserably to compare with the Scotty Maroon effort.
Last edited: