Zeeboe
New Member
I have never really cared for "Predator 2", nor did I enjoy the "Alien vs. Predator" films, and even though I liked the "Predator" character, I never did follow the comic books or video games that had the Predator in them. I honestly didn't like that whole concept of the Predator being included in all this pop culture and becoming a novelty and felt it took some of the seriousness and mystic away from the Predator. I mean, there were freakin' bobble heads for the Predator and you had little kids dressing up as him on Halloween. Come on man. I don't think that's good because I don't think people should be using the Predator as a source of comedy or as a tool to make their kids look cute.
I am happy to type that I really enjoyed "Predators" and feel that the film returned the character and the franchise to it's roots and made it scary and mysterious again. I feel Nimród Antal and Robert Rodriguez essentially did what director Tim Burton did with the Batman character in the late 1980's. In the 1960's, Batman became this goofy and campy cartoonish of a character that no one took seriously, until Tim Burton reinvented Batman, and made his own movie about the character, and made him dark, serious, and intense again, and that's very similar to what Antal and Rodriguez did with the Predator character.
I feel the reason why it worked is because the two took the time to make a decent film, and really think about what it was that people liked about the first Predator, but without ripping it off. I feel "Predator 2" was only made because the first one had a made a lot of money, so the studio quickly rushed to make a sequel, and just whipped something up, knowing just the words "Predator 2" on a movie poster would attract a crowd. Same applies with the "Alien vs. Predator" movies. I presume that the studios figure just take two highly established film characters, make a cross-over film, and there ya go, you attract a crowd, and the studio in my view clearly does not always care if the story in their films is good or not, as long as they make quick and easy money.
Predator 2 just doesn't have that "Do you ever get the feeling you're being watched?" vibe that both the original "Predator" and "Predators" has. Also, one of the appeals of both "Predator" and "Predators" is that the humans were on the Predator's turf, which added to the horror, whereas "Predator 2" took place on human turf, which took the horror away some in my view because we the viewers feel like we are on safe ground, and just knowing all it would take is the U.S. army to kill the Predator makes me feel a bit too comfortable as I watch "Predator 2" and what makes a scary film scary is I prefer to feel all on edge and uneasy.
I try to pretend "Predator 2" and the "Alien vs. Predator" films never happened and that "Predators" is the true, real, and only sequel to the 87' classic. VERY rarely do I come across sequels that were just as good or better then the first one, and I honestly think "Predators" is just as good as the original and is the ideal sequel.
I am happy to type that I really enjoyed "Predators" and feel that the film returned the character and the franchise to it's roots and made it scary and mysterious again. I feel Nimród Antal and Robert Rodriguez essentially did what director Tim Burton did with the Batman character in the late 1980's. In the 1960's, Batman became this goofy and campy cartoonish of a character that no one took seriously, until Tim Burton reinvented Batman, and made his own movie about the character, and made him dark, serious, and intense again, and that's very similar to what Antal and Rodriguez did with the Predator character.
I feel the reason why it worked is because the two took the time to make a decent film, and really think about what it was that people liked about the first Predator, but without ripping it off. I feel "Predator 2" was only made because the first one had a made a lot of money, so the studio quickly rushed to make a sequel, and just whipped something up, knowing just the words "Predator 2" on a movie poster would attract a crowd. Same applies with the "Alien vs. Predator" movies. I presume that the studios figure just take two highly established film characters, make a cross-over film, and there ya go, you attract a crowd, and the studio in my view clearly does not always care if the story in their films is good or not, as long as they make quick and easy money.
Predator 2 just doesn't have that "Do you ever get the feeling you're being watched?" vibe that both the original "Predator" and "Predators" has. Also, one of the appeals of both "Predator" and "Predators" is that the humans were on the Predator's turf, which added to the horror, whereas "Predator 2" took place on human turf, which took the horror away some in my view because we the viewers feel like we are on safe ground, and just knowing all it would take is the U.S. army to kill the Predator makes me feel a bit too comfortable as I watch "Predator 2" and what makes a scary film scary is I prefer to feel all on edge and uneasy.
I try to pretend "Predator 2" and the "Alien vs. Predator" films never happened and that "Predators" is the true, real, and only sequel to the 87' classic. VERY rarely do I come across sequels that were just as good or better then the first one, and I honestly think "Predators" is just as good as the original and is the ideal sequel.