Bloop
Sr Member
I like some Mel Brooks stuff, but not all. I think the ones that are the best had specific people involved that made them great. Like "Blazing Saddles" wouldn't have existed or been as good without Richard Pryor writing on it. And "Young Frankenstein" was really Gene Wilder's project. Mel Brooks has a group of different writers on each film, so you have to look at who wrote each on (other than just Brooks). Plus, certain actors shine more than others. The performances of Gene Wilder, Clevon Little, Madeline Kahn, Harvey Korman, & Marty Feldman elevate those films. Not to diminish Mel's comedic output, but it's not like he's writing, directing, and performing these all by himself. Some films miss the mark because they don't have the right combination of creatives behind them.My expectations are pretty low for this. But I also don't see the harm in it.
I mean, it's 'Spaceballs.' It's been 40 years. Are they destroying anybody's childhood here?
As for Mel Brooks, the dude is pushing 100yo and 'Spaceballs' was never one of his peak works. For all we know, this sequel might be happening whether it has his blessing or not.
Is he selling out by doing this?
FFS, he sold out when he made the first one. He abandoned the racy provocative comedy of his 1970s works in favor of a goofy PG-rated Star Wars ripoff with Rick Moranis as Darth Vader.
I liked the first 'Spaceballs' as much as most 1980s kids. But it's not high art.