Keycube
Well-Known Member
I found this movie as captivating as most anything I've seen in quite some time, until the ending left me a bit perplexed.
SPOILER AHEAD! (I know it's old, but, fair warning regardless)
Now, normally I love ambiguity; I don't mind if everything isn't tied up with a nice little bow; but I wouldn't mind a little direction here. We saw that Travis was prone to visions/fantasies/whatever...was this in the form of daydreaming? Are we supposed to assume that he was the one sleepwalking that night...OR...that he consciously went out and brought his dog home out of concern...or..???
I realize you couldn't very well drop the notion that Travis was a sleepwalker too early, and then have him (consciously or not) just project it on to the little boy, else it maybe ties it all up TOO easily.
It's been awhile since I've seen this, it just popped into my head for no real reason. Anyone want to give me their take on it?
SPOILER AHEAD! (I know it's old, but, fair warning regardless)
Now, normally I love ambiguity; I don't mind if everything isn't tied up with a nice little bow; but I wouldn't mind a little direction here. We saw that Travis was prone to visions/fantasies/whatever...was this in the form of daydreaming? Are we supposed to assume that he was the one sleepwalking that night...OR...that he consciously went out and brought his dog home out of concern...or..???
I realize you couldn't very well drop the notion that Travis was a sleepwalker too early, and then have him (consciously or not) just project it on to the little boy, else it maybe ties it all up TOO easily.
It's been awhile since I've seen this, it just popped into my head for no real reason. Anyone want to give me their take on it?