-
Welcome to the Project Runs Forum!
This forum is intended for interest gauging and active runs. Due to the transient nature of this forum, please keep all research and ongoing discussion in one of our main forums so your information is not lost.
Only Premium Members can start a new run.
Limited Run Han Solo ROTJ Blaster Active Project
- Thread starter Boba Debt
- Start date
ataru72ita
Sr Member
Again accurate is the way, but this time I give a preference, single hole is better IMHO.
maniacman7
Well-Known Member
Keep the second hole
IndustrialActn
Member
I'd vote to keep the hole
Curmudgeon
Well-Known Member
I'm going to vote to keep the hole since it seems like the rest of the parts are more accurate to the bunker blaster.
Does anyone have thoughts on the screw-looking thing in the square detail on the bunker blaster?
Does anyone have thoughts on the screw-looking thing in the square detail on the bunker blaster?
Darth Gius
Active Member
Keep the hole.
Here is an interesting video. Profiles in History says that it's a Han Solo blaster used in ESB and ROTJ.
The link to their site:
https://www.profilesinhistory.com/auctions/hollywood-auction-62/
The link to their site:
https://www.profilesinhistory.com/auctions/hollywood-auction-62/
Last edited by a moderator:
Boba Debt
Master Member
Now that you have the option of one or two holes for the muzzle I think we can move onto the Scope
I think we are good to go on the scope. We decided to go with glass watch crystals and I have those on hand and they will fit without any modifications to he prints.
We also decided to go with a threaded lens ring which barely impacted the overall price of the scope.
I was going to discuss threading the back end to the front end with my machinist once he had my parts set on hand but I don’t think that this will add to the scope and it could actually be a useless upgrade. Once those two parts are together there really isn’t a reason to take them back apart.
They only scope part left to discuss is the mesh insert for the tip and I would rather wait to discuss that part since it will probably not be machined and probable will not cost that much.
But if anyone has any questions of concerns please post them.
I think we are good to go on the scope. We decided to go with glass watch crystals and I have those on hand and they will fit without any modifications to he prints.
We also decided to go with a threaded lens ring which barely impacted the overall price of the scope.
I was going to discuss threading the back end to the front end with my machinist once he had my parts set on hand but I don’t think that this will add to the scope and it could actually be a useless upgrade. Once those two parts are together there really isn’t a reason to take them back apart.
They only scope part left to discuss is the mesh insert for the tip and I would rather wait to discuss that part since it will probably not be machined and probable will not cost that much.
But if anyone has any questions of concerns please post them.
Curmudgeon
Well-Known Member
No concerns here, the scope looks great to me!
extreme_too2
Well-Known Member
i realize this this is probably a question better left to the construction phase of the project, but is there a plan for keeping the back end connected to the rest of the rig?
What did we decide on for the knurled greeble on the tip portion? Are we going machined? Resin? I forgot...
Sean
Sean
Boba Debt
Master Member
We haven't even discussed that yet since it will either be a resin part or an inexpensive part such as a sink faucet screen, etc.
