Well, how well did Ridley Scott do adapting perhaps my favorite sci fi read of last year?
Answer: "You did a mans job Sir!"
A very smart and proper piece of craftmanship it is too. Its easily Ridleys best film for me in years.Not only did he manage to keep the clever problem solving survivalists tension of the novel but he did so without drowning it in the technical science or loosing the pace of the film over the extended timeline of the story ,which is a minor miracle.
And against all my expectations he's also managed to capture the "And always look on the bright side of life" darkish humour of Mark Watney, though to be honest he's helped massively here by Matt Damon who puts in the stirling "solo" performance of his life and I didn't expect that. I thought I'd struggle to see him at all as Watney , particularly with his role in "Interstellar" but the difference between characters caught in the same kind of situation is astonishing. Next to Jason Bourne I think this is best role I've seen him in and its certainly my favorite.
Both he and Ridley have managed to out perform my expectations with this film by a cosmic mile and then some and I thought that would be pretty difficult given how much I liked the novel. Its a clever planetary survival thriller using mostly true science to solve real problems and I'd have bet anything that they would have done something to "glamorise" the, aahem, less sanitary but essentially grubbier elements of the novel but fair credit, they've kept it all and it doesn't half add to the believablity of the tale.
And if you needed any more proof that most of the problems I and others had about "Prometheus" that could be laid at a certain writers door this is most definitely it. Not only did Drew Goddard solve the problem of the Watneys internal monologue in the novel in a very effective and technically modern manner, but he literally captures Mark Watneys voice doing it perfectly and so remains very faithful to the source material.If I were Andy Weir I'd be delighted with the whole film, its his novel on the screen and it looks spectacular. Its the most convincingly huge Martian landscape I've seen yet and Ridley plays this off against Watneys lone figure in a way you cannot really capture in a book, so thats a big plus.
I honestly couldn't find much if anything to fault with the film. Perhaps if they had used some less familiar faces in mission control and the "Hermes" I wouldn't have gone "well thats so and so then" at times,certainly for the amount of screen time they get the quality of the actors was a little under used, unlike say "Apollo 13" but its a minor gripe and it pretty much reflects the balance of the novel anyway.
So against all my expectations I hugely enjoyed "The Martian" and I've already read the book a couple of times. Whilst "Interstellar" disappointed me for all the very same reasons this most definitely did not, and I hope it does really well. It left me feeling hope for many reasons but you'll need to watch it to understand just why. For anyone else going into this, even if you're not interested in the "real" science aspects of the story, its still a compelling done man-against-the- odds survival tale and there's more humanity in the humour and the courage shown here than I've seen in a sci fi film for ages. I'd therefore have had a problem identifying it as a Ridley Scott film if only it wasn't for the designs and beautifully shot visuals which often have a very familar Promethean feel to them ,but unlike that story hes really hit the nail on the head with this adapation for me.
And for that I've got to thank him.
Do the same for the next two Ridley I'll be a VERY happy man.
PS Couple of things to watch for that made me laugh out loud but nobody else. The "staple" reference and the only reason why Sean Bean was cast as a character in this film.