Now which did you prefer?
The one we got. I read that online the other day.
Now which did you prefer?
However, I am not totally sure this even is a zombie film, in the way we are talking about zombies, ie, Romero zombies. This may be a 28 X Later style film, which is not a zombie film at all, it's a plague film.
Unfortunately, I think WWZ is more of a niche title as a book. While popular among certain people, it's definitely not as mainstream as those other.. things.. you mention. Because of that, the majority of the people that go to the movies will never have read the book (most probably aren't even aware that it exists), and will have no idea how low Hollywood sunk on this one.It's kind of sad how book adaptations like Stephanie Meyers' work will literally have her books translated almost word for word when it comes to the movie adaptations, but nobody anywhere seems to give a crap about how the movie World War Z's only connection to the source material is it's freaking title.
It's kind of sad how book adaptations like Stephanie Meyers' work will literally have her books translated almost word for word when it comes to the movie adaptations, but nobody anywhere seems to give a crap about how the movie World War Z's only connection to the source material is it's freaking title.
Seen it tonight in 3D, thought it was pretty good, not as good as I was hoping. I wish there was more gore as well, it would of added just that little bit more to the movie. People were also laughing at the "zombies" and I had to agree they were a little lame, not so much their appearance but their overall manner, I don't care if it is a virus or plague film, no virus can make people run and jump like that, it was stupid.
Yep, it will tank because the real zombie fans/teens want to see blood and gore.
You did not see much on either side. I don't need to see a zombie eating guts, but I do enjoy seeing them blasted.