If a reboot is such a bad remake of the original that it kills off the possibilities of a franchise is it still a reboot?So to me:
Re-make- a re-make of a movie using only a movie or television show as source material.
Re-boot- the restart of a popular franchise with source material of screen (books, comic books, urban legends, etc.).
Re-imagining- a buzz word used by producers and directors to let you know that they are re-making something in a way that totally screws up the original story.
Didn't they remake Girl With The Dragon Tattoo a year after the first one came out, or something?
I recall reading that the original cast/crew were livid as they were doing pretty much the exact same film, just in English with English-speaking actors. Subtitles and/or dubbing not good enough, or something? I also heard they were having to 'simplify' the plot...
I saw all three and they were either subtitled, or voice dubbed. Not remade.
Wizard of Oz was an adaptation of a classic book. There have been other adaptations of classic books where the productions actually overlapped in time with each other. Here are two that I know about:There was a great article on Cracked about this...apparently The Wizard of Oz is a remake.