Too Much Garlic
Master Member
Interesting to see the differences in approach, style and execution.
The helmet made of component parts i.e. Pemberton's - shows it is done by someone who does not understand a drawing.
I agree +1000% that Moore's interpretation is obviously superior, but it's always best to explore all avenues available, you never know what type of inspiration you can get, even from something as clunky, shoddy and crap-tacular as the Pemberton sculpt.Quoted for truth! I see what they are doing and it's laughable to imagine that crap-tacular interpretation EVER seeing the light of day.
Andrew recalls "The concept drawings from Ralph McQuarrie suggested that the Stormtrooper was a futuristic being that had evolved through continuous genetic modification, and perhaps able to operate in adverse pungent climatic conditions. The helmet would therefore be able to filter noxious gases and the armour be so flexible that it could have actually grown on the character that way - much the same as an armadillo has natural armour." It was obvious to Andrew that no joins or fabricated parts should be seen, the character should be homogeneous and so the head must flow into the body and be undercut to disguise any suggestion of an actor inside the costume. The surface of the character was to be hard and protective, but flexible with a smooth, slick finish. The drawing suggested a silver, metallic look. Producing a prototype with all these features would be a challenge, given the non-paying, speculative nature of the job.
Quoted for truth!
I see what they are doing and it's laughable to imagine that crap-tacular interpretation EVER seeing the light of day.
I get the whole industrial design claim but it's inexcusable to plagiarize someone else's work.
I correct myself. It's not plagiarism, it's flat out theft claiming the work that is not your own.
What's next, God told him to make a Stormtrooper helmet and it fortunately coincided with the film?
Surely Brian, tell me this has killed any other film work this guy will ever do.
Chuck...
I'm trying to understand this.
Is Ainsworth claiming here that after seeing McQuarrie's conceptual drawing of just the helmet he came up with the design of the organic armadillo armour all on his own, overnight, of course?
When did McQuarrie paint this?
I knew you would! Perv! No kilts though. Do Irish wear kilts?
I mentioned to the lawyer several times before the court case that Ainsworth never stated how he 'sculpted' the armour but it was not brought up in court. He now says on his website that he sculpted the moulds as he did the helmet - using himself as a dummy :confused
ahh Brian I see your point above - not being a sculptor myself - the pemberton simply has no fluidity and has very sharped/defined angles. Nose bridge on the Pemberton is quite triangular and stark - whereas, Liz's sculpt just flows.
Good observations. In addition, Pemberton interpreted surfaces that were meant to be recessed and sculpted them as bulging out. In other words he wasn't correctly interpreting the 3D qualities implied by the drawing. Gosh, I'm glad they went with Liz' sculpt.
Puerto Rican, Mac. I'll give you a pass, since you did not know. :angryAs the resident kilt-wearer here, I thought you were Mexican! :lol
Yes, that would definitely be quite telling.Seriously though, I want to see a face pulled from that ugly cement block he says is a mold.