feek61
Sr Member
I meant no hostility, it's mostly just frustration at your ignoring compelling evidence and putting forth your preposterous (at this point) theory. I respect you for asking the question to begin with and your tenacity but at some point the continual excuses for evidence and proof to the contrary of your theory becomes absurd; which is where we have been. People here have tried to help and have pointed out the flaws to your conclusions but you refuse to accept them. There are no photos of the inner dome which I'm sure you are aware of but you blissfully ignore other proof, all the while proposing wild speculation without any credible proof yourself. You have been shown still photography (not film clips) clearly showing the thin fan blades which would be impossible considering different shutter speeds of the camera verses a motion picture camera. There is no logical explanation that these photos of the fan size blades match the video stills almost exactly unless that is the actual size of them. Even if the still photography photographed the spinning fans; it still would not match the motion picture stills if they are as you say. Funny you mention the one person who very early agreed with you but he has not posted since any of the proof has been posted here. I respectfully withdraw from the discussion since you feel hostility (which is not my intent) and honestly I don't think I have anything further to add anyway. I was only trying to help answer your question which I really thought you wanted to know the truth; not use this to continually put forth your theory despite all evidence to the contrary. If you have proof like photos of the inner dome with slits in them or photos of the non blinking lights ; please post them. I would be interested in seeing those instead of wild speculation.
Take care
Cheers and good luck!!
Take care
Cheers and good luck!!
Last edited: