Almost every built-up model kit I've seen with a glossy finish looks like a toy to me. Unless it's a car kit that's supposed to look showroom fresh, I matte/flat coat almost everything I build. Of course, that's just a personal preference, but you asked.
As far as finish, Star Wars is known for and even iconic for have old, worn, battle damaged, and even dirty vehicles. Based on that nothing would have a glossy look or finish. It also flies in the face of how the real military does things. Unless something just came from a battle field, everything is usually very clean. Flats and drab colors are an obvious- so they don't reflect light and make a vehicle an easy target. That said, that's the real world and this is sc-fi, so anything can go.
I guess the question is this- How did McQuarrie envision this ship? Battle worn and dirty, or more clean and pristine? Personally I wouldn't go with anything more than a satin finish but that's just me. I was in the military and everything does have more of a matte finish for the reason I mentioned above. Unless it's a show vehicle like the Blue Angels or something like that.
Oh, good point! The Star Wars universe in McQuarrie's paintings was far more clean and pristine than it was in the movies, but very few items were painted as having any sort of "shine" other than Vader's helmet and the Stormtroopers' armor. Even the painting in the first post shows the X-Wing as being very clean and well maintained, but I don't see any indications of glossiness....I guess the question is this- How did McQuarrie envision this ship? Battle worn and dirty, or more clean and pristine? Personally I wouldn't go with anything more than a satin finish but that's just me...
So I just made this vent things..whatever they are.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180309/f61a498f210ac56afbe8ad97cb8e1ef1.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd always saw that as gear teeth.