New Luke ROTJ v2 3d model comparison and analysis
- Thread starter Anakin Starkiller
- Start date
Here's a shot of the old design compared with the new model
this is what i get for looking at a small screen, sorry about that dan
- - - Updated - - -
wicked cool comparison!!
MakBzh
Active Member
Great news Dan !!! 
I've got few remarks especially like Halliwax said. (Maybe you already know it like you said in a previous post)
But, in my picture the colors area (Especially the red and yellow) seems to be taller compare to brandon's V2.
The blue one is maybe a "shadow-game", because of the different angle of the picture.
I've got few remarks especially like Halliwax said. (Maybe you already know it like you said in a previous post)
But, in my picture the colors area (Especially the red and yellow) seems to be taller compare to brandon's V2.
The blue one is maybe a "shadow-game", because of the different angle of the picture.
Agreed, the red and yellow marked areas seem off to me too. Your computer model seems to show much different angles. But excited by the progress!
Great news Dan !!!
I've got few remarks especially like Halliwax said. (Maybe you already know it like you said in a previous post)
But, in my picture the colors area (Especially the red and yellow) seems to be taller compare to brandon's V2.
The blue one is maybe a "shadow-game", because of the different angle of the picture.
View attachment 785565
el toro
Sr Member
Good eyes. I agree the yellow area may be a bit large. I'm not sure sure about the red area though. It looks ok at first glance. It's difficult to tell about the blue area as we're looking at the booster at a slight downward angle.
Dan, beautiful work already!
Dan, beautiful work already!
Great news Dan !!!
I've got few remarks especially like Halliwax said. (Maybe you already know it like you said in a previous post)
But, in my picture the colors area (Especially the red and yellow) seems to be taller compare to brandon's V2.
The blue one is maybe a "shadow-game", because of the different angle of the picture.
View attachment 785565
I agree as well. it looks spectacular and the emitter/ pommel especially.
the shoulder above the clamp seems to have a longer length than the V2 itself. angle might be right, but on the V2 they're tiny transitions and on the sample all three sections are too long. (last part of the grenade, bevel and then part above clamp. was this what you'd mentioned the shop had to correct?
the shoulder above the clamp seems to have a longer length than the V2 itself. angle might be right, but on the V2 they're tiny transitions and on the sample all three sections are too long. (last part of the grenade, bevel and then part above clamp. was this what you'd mentioned the shop had to correct?
MakBzh
Active Member
It's true that the angle make a slightly difference and make it harder to compare.
If we compare this section : (Red = Dan, Yellow = Brandon)
But we are maybe debating about the corrections that Dan already asked to the shop
If we compare this section : (Red = Dan, Yellow = Brandon)
But we are maybe debating about the corrections that Dan already asked to the shop
Last edited:
FarStarbuck
New Member
Here’s an idea why not retake the image in the same way that everyone here seems to be comparing it to in the other image?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Easier said than done
- - - Updated - - -
It's true that the angle make a slightly difference and make it harder to compare.
If we compare this section : (Red = Dan, Yellow = Brandon)
View attachment 785639
View attachment 785640
But we are maybe debating about the corrections that Dan already asked to the shop
I've made these changes to my model now, so we should be all set here. I also moved the transcriptor knob hole and the pommel set screw hole up a little bit towards the emitter on the booster, since they looked a little low in these comparisons. Anything else?
FarStarbuck
New Member
Fair enough, just trying to save this from criticism as it’s like comparing apples and oranges at the moment. With the viewing angle being different I don’t see the point in comparing until it’s a fair comparison.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
thank you dan, i think these changes are a positive :thumbsup
MakBzh
Active Member
Great Dan [emoji3]
Really excited by the progress so far !
Envoyé de mon SM-G930F en utilisant Tapatalk
Amazing work! It looks fantastic!
I don't know if this will help at all but I took both images and overlayed them, rotated, etc. to get them as close as possible to the same width, and aligned without skewing any proportions. Then I mirrored it and lined it up edge to edge. So even though the camera angle isn't exact, the edges are what matter in this case. And for what it's worth, apart from that one area, everything else seems to match up amazingly well when aligned with the pomel, emitter, grenade section, etc. I can't believe how close this is!
I don't know if this will help at all but I took both images and overlayed them, rotated, etc. to get them as close as possible to the same width, and aligned without skewing any proportions. Then I mirrored it and lined it up edge to edge. So even though the camera angle isn't exact, the edges are what matter in this case. And for what it's worth, apart from that one area, everything else seems to match up amazingly well when aligned with the pomel, emitter, grenade section, etc. I can't believe how close this is!
