Re: Ghostbusters Post Release
-edit Checking theater times.. Clifton commons, a big theater in NJ only has one showing at all for saturday. a 3D showing at 7PM. that's it. somehow i doubt that's right for a big theater like that, but it'd be nice.
http://nerdist.com/the-new-ghostbusters-doesnt-ruin-your-childhood-review/
last one for the night. never did like nerdist, now sony shill.
'the movie feels better when feig is in control'...poor, poor shill.
another contradicting article too
>>People wondering if this version–which Feig co-wrote with Katie Dippold–would be faithful to the spirit (pun intended) of the original, or indeed if it would tread all the same ground as the 1984 movie, can rest assured that the story feels almost entirely different, while there are certainly references and nods to what people remember about the old one.
>>
It pretty much copies and pastes. what's new? Slimer even pops out of a hot dog cart..
>>>
That said, I do wish it had distanced itself more from the original. While the storyline is completely new and none of the characters are direct retreads of the ones in the first one, there are constant nods that have a tendency to take the viewer out of it. There’s an argument to be made that the original surviving cast members should have played their original characters in a passing-of-the-baton moment, but I’m actually glad they didn’t. The actors are there and pass the baton just fine in their cameos; we don’t need Dr. Peter Venkman or Dr. Ray Stantz there to make people say “Why couldn’t we just have had them do a movie?”
>
I wonder if they covered the sony leaks, or they wouldn't have this 'baton passing' nonsense.
more madness tomorrow, i'm sure.
they can't stop people posting reviews from england.
