I have ZERO issue with the frequency of film releases.
I DO have issues with the people in charge allowing a non-cohesive story, inconsistent character development and timeline of events pass through the green light in getting made.
I don't mind different directors. I DO mind that everything is completely disjointed and makes absolutely no sense, and that there is no intent for any elements placed into these films.
Is there REALLY a group of people that are looking at these story ideas coming through saying that Solo needed to be told? So far there's not one person I know, either hardcore nor casual Star Wars fan who agreed that this should get made. So what geniuses are part of this board who decided that this was was a priority over, say... I don't know... How about The Knights of Ren? This mysterious and rather interesting group people have talked about were COMPLETELY ignored in The Last Jedi. Maybe they should have featured in a film with Kylo Ren to show their story and downfall(?) prior to what seemed to be Kylo as the sole knight left leading the First Order.
Obviously that isn't the best idea I could come up with, but it's different, yet familiar to TFA and an extension of it, which seems to be what Disney is wanting to do in moving FORWARD.
If Disney wants to let the past die, why did they make Solo, or even Rogue One for that matter? Two Star Wars stories pre-OT.
Disney needs a very passionate, but objective leader who can see the forest from the trees such as Feige of the MCU, who truly understands the universe and connecting it all together, and with respect to the characters, lore, and magic of what makes Star Wars a force to be reckoned with.
I DO have issues with the people in charge allowing a non-cohesive story, inconsistent character development and timeline of events pass through the green light in getting made.
I don't mind different directors. I DO mind that everything is completely disjointed and makes absolutely no sense, and that there is no intent for any elements placed into these films.
Is there REALLY a group of people that are looking at these story ideas coming through saying that Solo needed to be told? So far there's not one person I know, either hardcore nor casual Star Wars fan who agreed that this should get made. So what geniuses are part of this board who decided that this was was a priority over, say... I don't know... How about The Knights of Ren? This mysterious and rather interesting group people have talked about were COMPLETELY ignored in The Last Jedi. Maybe they should have featured in a film with Kylo Ren to show their story and downfall(?) prior to what seemed to be Kylo as the sole knight left leading the First Order.
Obviously that isn't the best idea I could come up with, but it's different, yet familiar to TFA and an extension of it, which seems to be what Disney is wanting to do in moving FORWARD.
If Disney wants to let the past die, why did they make Solo, or even Rogue One for that matter? Two Star Wars stories pre-OT.
Disney needs a very passionate, but objective leader who can see the forest from the trees such as Feige of the MCU, who truly understands the universe and connecting it all together, and with respect to the characters, lore, and magic of what makes Star Wars a force to be reckoned with.