Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Pre-release)

Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Which begs the question: Was that due to Jackson's acting skills or Lucas' direction?

Lucas is a bad director for actors, it's pretty much accepted knowledge. IMO everyone had the same slate to work with (both OT and PT) so it's up to the actors to take ownership of their characters.

So, it was on Sam.

GL told the actors to speak the dialogue that way, therefore you can not fault them at all. Every single one of the actors could have made the dialogue work (for the most part) if not for Lucas direction.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

GL told the actors to speak the dialogue that way, therefore you can not fault them at all. Every single one of the actors could have made the dialogue work (for the most part) if not for Lucas direction.

Then how come a few of the actors were able to inject character into their roles?
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

That Ford guy is going to go far...

You heard it here first.
:D
313731_526584240740986_51294832_n.jpg
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

There's a big difference between good character and dialogue delivery...there are plenty of movies with terrible characters with awesome dialogue and visa versa

There's also a difference between a performance that sounds like it's read off a page and one that sounds like it's got some heart in it.

I like SLJ, he's a great actor, but he was miscast and subsequently didn't do much of anything in the role. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. ;)
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

In the PT movies, it seems to me that the actors portraying characters that were introduced in the OT (i.e., Ian McDiarmid as Palpatine/Sidious, Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan Kenobi, Anthony Daniels as C-3PO, Peter Mayhew as Chewbacca, etc.) were given more leeway to re-create those characters as we know them, while the actors portraying "new" characters introduced in the PT movies were as stiff as dried-out driftwood.


Something noteworthy in the contrast above is that pretty much all (except Chewbacca, who didn't speak) the actors whose lines were delivered well were English, the rest American. American actors usually have problems with formal dialog, owing to our more casual nature presumably. Natalie Portman's portrayal of Padme is a perfect example; nothing she said sounded natural, whereas Ian McDiarmid, Ewan McGregor, Anthony Daniels, etc., can deliver lines without contracted words perfectly.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Which begs the question: Was that due to Jackson's acting skills or Lucas' direction?


Without a doubt it was Lucas' direction. Just look at SLJ in any Tarantino film, The Long Kiss Goodnight, A Time to Kill, etc. The man can act his ass off, but when he's given direction like he got from Lucas....well, you see the end result. The same can be said for just about everyone else in the PT except for Ian McDiarmid who was still able to give great performances in spite of Lucas' direction and wooden dialogue.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

For me, Jackson lost it after he became mainstream popular with Pulp Fiction. You see him in prior films, and he's really playing the character. He was good in PF but he's been mostly the same in every film since. I can't watch him without thinking "this is Sam Jackson acting." Same with Kevin Spacey after Usual Suspects. Ruined him as a character actor.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Without a doubt it was Lucas' direction. Just look at SLJ in any Tarantino film, The Long Kiss Goodnight, A Time to Kill, etc. The man can act his ass off, but when he's given direction like he got from Lucas....well, you see the end result. The same can be said for just about everyone else in the PT except for Ian McDiarmid who was still able to give great performances in spite of Lucas' direction and wooden dialogue.
His acting took a dip in AotC if you ask me. But i do think he was the best of them all in the PT, with Ewan McGregor a close second.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I'd say Ian McDiarmid was the best of the PT cast followed by Frank Oz, Ewan, Anthony Daniels, and then Liam. SLJ isn't on that list at all. If Mace had been a bit more of a badass it would have worked I think.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII


Ok. Acting is where you pretend to be someone else.

Samuel Jackson is always the 'guy with attitude'. Always. If you say he's in a movie, you know EXACTLY what you're getting. I can't think of an example where he's different. Having said that, I don't watch many of his movies because he sucks.

Contrast a real actor like, say, Bryan Cranston or Gary Oldman and you'll see what I mean.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Actually, you can simultaneously be the guy that always plays the same character, and the best actor in a film. Neeson, Jackson, Christensen and McGregor were all playing dull-as-ditchwater Jedi Knights. Samuel L. Jackson was the only one that was even slightly credible IMO.
 
Re: Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Ok. Acting is where you pretend to be someone else.



Not every method of acting would agree with that. Many are centered around indentifying and honing in on aspects of the performer's own personality that are complimentary or supportive of the character.

I don't have an opinion on Jackson one way or the other, I just feel like it's a narrow view to condemn a performer on the bredth of the work rather than the quality.
 
This thread is more than 8 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top