Originally posted by Gigatron+Oct 18 2005, 05:01 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Gigatron @ Oct 18 2005, 05:01 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-DARKSIDE72@Oct 18 2005, 09:44 PM
A Lanc huh... too cool. My Grandfather was a rear gunner in a Lanc. He took the last two shells out of her at the end of the war and had them mounted. I have them.Â
Here is a 7.7mm shell next to standard 9mm for size comparison. It's a big shell.
[snapback]1099197[/snapback]
Maybe I don't understand ammo designation as well as I thought (ok, most likely not ), but how in the world is 7.7mm larger than 9mm? Maybe you meant 12.7mm (approx. 50 cal)? That would be better. Isn't the mm measurement the diameter of the bullet (not including the case)? If so, that big ol' hunka lead is still larger than the 9mm you have next to it.
If I'm wrong about the measurement designation, please correct me as I'm always confused about the relationship between mm and caliber.
-Fred
[snapback]1099220[/snapback][/b]
I've ever seen have a heatsink on the front.
Originally posted by blewis17@Oct 19 2005, 12:20 AM
So we just need to find the right SIZE cooling fin (just like there were/are variations on the OB1 emmiter)
[snapback]1099241[/snapback]
Originally posted by DARKSIDE72+Oct 18 2005, 03:42 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DARKSIDE72 @ Oct 18 2005, 03:42 PM)</div>Originally posted by Gigatron@Oct 18 2005, 05:01 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-DARKSIDE72@Oct 18 2005, 09:44 PM
A Lanc huh... too cool. My Grandfather was a rear gunner in a Lanc. He took the last two shells out of her at the end of the war and had them mounted. I have them.Â
Here is a 7.7mm shell next to standard 9mm for size comparison. It's a big shell.
[snapback]1099197[/snapback]
Maybe I don't understand ammo designation as well as I thought (ok, most likely not ), but how in the world is 7.7mm larger than 9mm? Maybe you meant 12.7mm (approx. 50 cal)? That would be better. Isn't the mm measurement the diameter of the bullet (not including the case)? If so, that big ol' hunka lead is still larger than the 9mm you have next to it.
If I'm wrong about the measurement designation, please correct me as I'm always confused about the relationship between mm and caliber.
-Fred
[snapback]1099220[/snapback]
I honestly don't know the answer to that question. I do know that the Lancaster Hurricane, Mosquito, Spitfire, and many other British planes used the browning 7.7mm (0.303 in). The shell is stamped 1940 B 7.7
[snapback]1099259[/snapback][/b]
Originally posted by jedipunk@Oct 19 2005, 12:23 AM
Just taking Darth Lars' comp a step further:
"Gear" spacing looks dead on if the actual part is the correct scale.
I think we're on the right track anyway.
Awesome job.
-Chris
[snapback]1099321[/snapback]
Originally posted by Bowelrock@Oct 18 2005, 04:22 PM
Whatever Frank you know waht I mean. :rolleyes
[snapback]1099246[/snapback]
Originally posted by Gigatron@Oct 18 2005, 10:01 PM
Maybe I don't understand ammo designation as well as I thought (ok, most likely not ), but how in the world is 7.7mm larger than 9mm? Maybe you meant 12.7mm (approx. 50 cal)? That would be better. Isn't the mm measurement the diameter of the bullet (not including the case)? If so, that big ol' hunka lead is still larger than the 9mm you have next to it.
If I'm wrong about the measurement designation, please correct me as I'm always confused about the relationship between mm and caliber.
-Fred
[snapback]1099220[/snapback]