$10.00 2001 Monolith

darth_myeek

darth_myeek

Sr Member
Let's all jump on the Monolith bandwagon shall we?

I have to admit I was inspired by Sycor's run, and Karl's math. The Monolith is made from custom cut clear acrylic from Tap Plastic, painted with auto primer and satin black. The base was from Tap's scrap bin. It's the same plastic used for cutting boards. No glue sticks to that plastic, so I used two stainless steel screws. Black edging and stripes are made from acid free black tape.

5307848931_7509e3817f.jpg


My HAL inspired pic, with Christmas tree for scale.
5308437780_a1ed56de74_z.jpg
 
Weequay said:
Thats awsome!

Whats the scale? Im a little confused. can you give the diemnsions??

Weequay
Click to expand...

Thanks Weequay.
Sure. I used Phase Pistol's scale from Sycor's JY thread for the width and height. [4:10] I didn't want a large replica so I went with inches. 4" wide, 10" tall. I think he said the thickness was approximately .6, but I made it .75 or 3/4". For some reason, I missed his thickness calculation and interpreted from his graphed pics that it was probably 9" thick. I am in no way refuting .6. It is just what I went with.

Can't wait to see your Monolith!
 
What a beautiful model! The finish to this is very well done, very clean and precise. I do have one question though.

If your model is 4" wide, shouldn't it be 9" tall by 1" thick?

I'm no expert on this film and yes, I'm a newbie here with less than a handful of posts, so you don't have to listen to me, but as I understood the book, the Monolith's proportions were 1:4:9 (the square of 1, 2 and 3).

Maybe the prop was built differently, but knowing Clarke's approach to the making of the movie with Kubrick, somehow I can't see this happening.

Whatever is the case, I think your model is just lovely as it is.
 
Holluba said:
If your model is 4" wide, shouldn't it be 9" tall by 1" thick?

I'm no expert on this film and yes, I'm a newbie here with less than a handful of posts, so you don't have to listen to me, but as I understood the book, the Monolith's proportions were 1:4:9 (the square of 1, 2 and 3).
Click to expand...

Thanks Holluba, and welcome.

Please see Phase Pistol's post #12.. He's our resident master of time&space, etc. :love
 
Ah, thanks for that - what an interesting read!

Like I said, I'm no expert. Just goes to show that sometimes what you take for granted, isn't always the case. Bummer, for more than 25 years I've had these numbers in my head as the size of the Monolith, now I see that the prop was different to the text.

Who'd have thunk it.
 
The best thing about this place is the quest for accuracy. Just a bunch of passionate folks. Hilarious nit-picking a rectangle huh? :lol

I think why I like Kubrick's ratio better is because 9 would have been "easier" on the eye. The 9 of the 1:4:9 is where one's eye would expect the ratio to stop. The 10 value goes beyond and adds an imposing stretch which is somewhat alien.
 
darth_myeek said:
The best thing about this place is the quest for accuracy. Just a bunch of passionate folks. Hilarious nit-picking a rectangle huh? :lol
Click to expand...
I know what you mean, I have the same sentiments when it comes to my area of interest; if it's even a mm out, I'm not happy and I have to go back and re-do it. This is particularly disturbing if I notice the flaw after I think I've finished the piece!
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolith_(Space_Odyssey)

All the monoliths are black, extremely flat, non-reflective cuboids whose dimensions are in the precise ratio 1:4:9 (the squares of the first three integers). These dimensions are the main source of debate regarding the monoliths' simple external design. It is suggested in the novel that this number series does not stop at three dimensions.
 
I love it. You have chosen the perfect subject to model.

I may have to visit the alliterative Petersons Plastics on Pulaski and make my own now.
 
This thread is more than 13 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.

Similar threads

C
1/6 2001 Pod replica.
Replies
13
Views
491
joberg
joberg
ajamodels
RUSSIAN 'BOMB' 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY
Replies
7
Views
830
publiusr
P
joberg
2001 Nuke satellite
2
Replies
22
Views
2,158
CosmicQuest
CosmicQuest
joberg
2001 landing bay 1:72 scale WIP
7 8 9
Replies
168
Views
11,895
joberg
joberg
Jaxter
2001: Aries 1-B
Replies
3
Views
1,056
joberg
joberg
Back
Top