Mr Webber
Master Member
James cameron is really a quarter time director.
In the last 28 years he has directed 4 movies which is quite a pitiful number given his wealth and talent. He really is a lazy film maker.
Ridley in comparison is a director who isnt fussy. He gets the job done quickly.
He is quick and efficient.
One of the most efficient today.
Maybe they can collaborate one day.
You raise some very interesting points there airair.
The description of Scott is pretty much spot on. Some could argue that some of his work has suffered because of that but it can also be argued that it is a strength that has produced some of his best work.
Maybe a little harsh on Cameron as two of those four movies are the biggest movies in all history, cant sit through either of them but also couldnt begin to imagine how that would feel. He has got into the whole exploration thing as well and produced some remarkable achievements in that area. If Disney try to pull any crap on him with the upcoming Avatar projects, I wouldnt want to be in their shoes.
A collaboration? Wow, now thats something to think about for sure.
Pretty much impossible though as two such powerful and independent film makers with equal sized egos would at the least, clash.
Also, I dont think they like each other very much. Cameron was asked a few years ago if he would direct Blade Runner 2 and his response was "Why should I clear up Ridleys mess again"...WOW.