joshvanrad
Sr Member
I can't stand the design of the PT. That's a huge part of my complaints about them. Justify it however you want, but to me it just never fit.
Why should the rule be any different for a fictional item designed in 1977? Why should an update to a fictional item originally designed in 1977 be tied to the "1977 design aesthetic" when, just like in the "real" world, 40 years of cultural changes have passed?
Oh for **** sake... Everyone bitched when the Naboo starfighter came out because it was "too modern" and "not old looking". But if a tie fighter or X-wing evolves it's unoriginal. You can't win with Star Wars fans.
I can't stand the design of the PT. That's a huge part of my complaints about them. Justify it however you want, but to me it just never fit.
As I mentioned before, the empire began to control production. Going from the prequels to the OT is like going from Tokyo to north koreaMy issue with the PT is that it ends 20 years prior to the OT and yet the designs (of everything not just ships) seem like they are cut from a completely different cloth. It just doesn't feel like a society should have changed so drastically in such a short time.
Patience... Monday night.Can we just get the trailer already?
What do you think NYCC will get this weekend? Anything special?
To me, the naboo ships didn't look futuristic at all. They looked like 1940's racecarsHeck just compare 50s cars to 70s cars, like they're from different universes.
bryan those are screen used props?!
My issue with the PT is that it ends 20 years prior to the OT and yet the designs (of everything not just ships) seem like they are cut from a completely different cloth. It just doesn't feel like a society should have changed so drastically in such a short time.