No but the PT did heavily imply that accessing the Force wasn’t a universal ability. That it was depedant on other factors. In ‘77 I believed in a more egalitarian view of the Force, that everyone could access it but only the most serious could master it. That concept seems to be coming back as evidenced in that coda.
Okay, more beer talk. :cheers This bugs me and fans get it wrong all the time. The idea that in 1977 there was a "more egalitarian view of the Force, that everyone could access it but only the most serious could master it" is only true
if you didn't watch the original movies. Right from the beginning, when Ben tells Luke the truth about Luke's father being a Jedi and not some navigator on a freighter, it was implied that Luke had the potential to be a Jedi
because of his father. Because of lineage. Because of a bloodline. Ability and exceptional power passed from father to son. A genetic factor. That idea was only underscored in bold with yellow highlighter and gold stars in ROTJ when Ben told Luke that the "emperor knew, as I did, that if Anakin were to have any
offspring they would be a threat to him." Luke tells Leia, "The Force runs strong in my family. My father has it, I have it, and... my sister has it." There has been a biological factor to Force ability since the very first movie. Fans love to crap on the prequels because of midichlorians, but if they do IMHO it's because they fundamentally don't understand what has been put directly in front of them in the OT. Midichlorians only give name to something we're told is there from the beginning: that ability to USE the Force can be passed through bloodlines. That doesn't mean that ONLY people whose parents were Jedi can use the Force. Some children are born stronger in it than others. These children need to be identified, found, and nurtured so they can use their abilities for good. But it most definitely can be passed along through bloodlines -- and that can be dangerous. That's why Jedi are banned from having children. The Clone Wars did an episode on it. Seriously, when I hear people complaining about midchlorians I can only think, "You really don't get this at all." There is nothing about the concept of midichlorians that doesn't completely mesh with what happens in the OT. Now, one can make the argument that Lucas didn't
need to put a name on this biological component -- and in a sane world I might agree with you. But here's the truth: Lucas NEEDED to name midichlorians for a very important reason: the world isn't sane. Some fans are friggin' nuts. Really. Some fans have mental health problems. Some fans can't easily separate fact from fiction. If they could, there wouldn't have been some nut showing up at Lucasfilm in 1978 saying Lucas stole the idea of Star Wars and as proof he'd "parked the Millennium Falcon in the parking lot" (and that really happened). There's undoubtedly stories only Lucas and some insiders know about crazy and criminal fan behavior. It's been said other places, but I think it's absolutely true, that Lucas named midichlorians because he was worried that crazy fans would actually try to turn the Force into a real religion. There's precedent. In Australia some people have registered "Jedi" as an official religion. I think by the time Lucas made the PT he was all too aware of how far fans go overboard and he simply didn't want to become the next L. Ron Hubbard against his will. So he took the biological component that was already there and just gave it a name as a way to remind people that Star Wars is fiction and a fairy tale. To not take it too seriously. To not be whackjobs about it. Personally, I think he was right. So to me, midichlorians aren't just completely fine, but they're really really important to prevent this story from being perverted into something it should never be. Frankly, it bugs me that Disney is bowing to fan pressure to ignore midichlorians because freako fans are the reason they exist at all.
- - - Updated - - -
How do people keep missing the point that even though Luke was tempted to kill Ben\Kylo, he didn't?!?!
The fact that he was tempted IS the problem. The ending of ROTJ was about Luke overcoming his temptations and rejecting such violence. That's HOW he became a Jedi. He couldn't become a Jedi without doing it. It was why Anakin was a failed Jedi. It was the entire point of the saga! By having Luke suddenly tempted AGAIN makes his victory in ROTJ meaningless. He apparently learned nothing.