Star Wars: The Last Jedi (Post-release)

What did you think of Star Wars: The Last Jedi?

  • It was great. Loved it. Don't miss it at the theaters.

    Votes: 154 26.6%
  • It was good. Liked it very much. Worth the theater visit.

    Votes: 135 23.4%
  • It was okay. Not too pleased with it. Could watch it at the cinema once or wait for home video.

    Votes: 117 20.2%
  • It was disappointing. Watch it on home video instead.

    Votes: 70 12.1%
  • It was bad. Don't waste your time with it.

    Votes: 102 17.6%

  • Total voters
    578
Do a search for "best Breaking Bad episodes" and guess what comes up?

Not only does Fly make the list of best... so does Ozymandias, which received critical acclaim and is hailed by many, not only as Breaking Bad's best episode, but, one of the greatest episodes of television ever.

(Fly was also produced with the mandate that it be made with a huge cut in budget. Time, EW, Vulture and others raved about the episode... and I don't think anyone can deny the performances in the episode).

This is old news,...but I thought I'd reiterate it.

Do a search for the WORST episode of Breaking Bad

You will find "Fly"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_(Breaking_Bad)



Directed by Rian Johnson

Theres a surprise

J
 
Luke's training was brief but at least he had training. Plus because there is a few years gap between ANH and ESB and Luke presumably sees Ben's ghost for the first time in the beginning of Empire, we can infer that any progress Luke has made in that time has been largely self taught. He BARELY is able to Force grab his saber in time in the Wampa cave.

The whole battle with Vader in Empire was one sided. Vader could have killed him at any point but his motive was to convert him, not kill him. Plus Luke's lineage (aka Anakin Skywalker) would give a quick and reasonable explanation as to how Luke could hone his abilities. By the time of Return of the Jedi, Luke has made progress and has become as good of a Jedi Knight as he could ever be, though we can assume that he would never be as powerful as the Jedi of old because his teachings were so short lived.

Rey had no lineage to any Force user that we know of and apparently the Force created her. It's the same crappy idea recycled from Anakin in TPM and it's as stupid now as it was then. Plus she has no instruction of any kind. None whatsoever. Plus she never fails at her attempts to tap into the Force and isn't tempted to give in to the dark side.

Here are some key moments in Luke's journey that expose his flaws, show vulnerability, or instances where he must make a choice that will make him deal with his internal conflicts.

-Luke sees Leia's message but when he tells his uncle about it he is told to erase the message. That also leads to Owen telling Luke that he cannot join the Academy and that Luke must wait another year to go and so he is stuck on the farm.
-When R2 runs off Luke is attacked by the Tusken Raiders and Obi-Wan rescues him. It is revealed that he has been lied to about his father who was in reality a Jedi Knight and not a navigator on a spice freighter as his uncle told him.
-He also learns that his father was murdered by Darth Vader.
-After showing R2's message to him, Ben asks Luke to come with him to Alderaan but Luke refuses because of his obligation to his uncle and the farm.
-Luke's family is murdered and home destroyed, leaving him with no choice but to go with Obi-Wan.
-Obi-Wan uses the Force to get the Sandtroopers off their backs as they enter Mos Eisley.
-He gets shoved around and thrown across the room by the Cantina patrons. Obi-Wan has to cut off the guy's arm to get him to leave Luke alone.
-Luke gets hit by the remote blaster bolts, and only after instruction is able to block the rays.
-Luke is grabbed by the garbage compactor monster and Han has to help him. The monster eventually lets him go, but Luke is the one taken into the water.
-Luke is able to blow up the Death Star when Han returns to get Vader off his back. Had Han not showed up Luke would have been blasted out of the sky.
-Luke is attacked by the Wampa and dragged off to it's cave.
-He is barely able to use the Force to grab his saber from the ground and free himself from the ceiling.
-Han rescues Luke from the frigid temperatures of Hoth.
-Luke crash lands on Dagobah. For a skilled pilot, this shouldn't have been a problem.
-Yoda acts all crazy to test Luke's patience and he fails when he loses his temper with the Jedi Master.
-Yoda tells Luke that he must enter the cave without his weapons and Luke does not listen. There he has the vision of facing Vader
-Luke fails to lift the X-Wing from the bog because he fails to understand Yoda's teaching.
-Luke fails to keep his concentration when lifting rocks, R2, and balancing Yoda when he has a vision of Han and Leia in trouble
-Luke leaves Dagobah before finishing his training to help his friends despite Yoda and Ben's warnings
-Luke's loses his hand and learns the truth that Vader didn't murder his father, but that he IS his father.
-Luke must be rescued by Leia, Lando and Chewie.

Those are just some examples of how Luke progresses as a character. We see his flaws, we see that he is vulnerable and we can relate to him. His ideas are challenged and by Return of the Jedi he is even tempted by the dark side which further escalates his struggle. The whole trilogy builds up to that one moment where he defies the Emperor by refusing to kill Vader. It's triumphant and such an emotionally satisfying peak for his character.

Look at all that we KNOW about Luke as a character, just by watching those three movies. By listing his flaws/ weaknesses and showing his conflicts we as the audience are invested in him because we see ourselves reflected in him. He BECOMES a Jedi by the end of the trilogy because the conflicts (both internal and external) have shaped him. The irony of seeing his weakness is that it actually makes him a stronger character because we witness the change.

What have we learned about Rey thus far?

-She is a scavenger who trades junk for food.
-She lives alone on the wastes of Jakku waiting for the family that abandoned her to return.
--She is mechanically inclined so would have some idea how to fix things
-She is tough enough to defend herself because she does live alone on a harsh desert planet
-She can speak multiple languages because she interacts with lots of species of aliens on her world and at the junkyard
-She does the right thing by not selling BB-8 and generally looking out for him so she does have at least a conscience that she listens to

-Kylo Ren is able to paralyze her and knock her unconscious and just when we see that he is stronger than her in that moment, it is undone when she resists his mind probe later on, is able to tap into his mind and scare him by exposing his weakness. From there on out she is no longer vulnerable.

When she goes after Luke he tells her two things about the Force and lies to her about Kylo Ren, who she suddenly sympathizes with? Even though only days before she hated Ben for killing Han Solo. Mind you Kylo was Han's son and Rey apparently had a stronger attachment to Han than Kylo did? What? And now she is on his side and convinced that she can turn Ben back to the light, when not even Luke could. If anything it makes her arrogant. It's just too convenient and seems more in line with the desires of Rian Johnson rather than a natural progression for Rey as a character. So what if Luke lied about Kylo? (Luke's ridiculous unrealistic motivations aside.) What personal investment does Rey have to a man that kidnapped her and probed her mind without her consent? Why would she even care if Luke tried to kill him? He's a monster in her words. Now she cares about him? I don't buy it in the least.

We simply don't know enough about her character other than she doesn't know what her place in the story is, and quite frankly it's clear that the writers don't know what her place in the story is either because they haven't been able to come up with any answers that aren't either contradictory or outright nonsensical. They don't come across as logical motivations for the natural progression of the character but as plot contrivances to keep the audience invested when there is little to nothing to go on. The blame lays on J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson for that. J. J. for setting it up as a mystery, and Johnson for giving absurd answers to the questions raised.

QFT ...
 
Vader's remark based on Luke's evasive maneuvers? Nah.

What was Vader attempting to do in those moments? Get Luke into his crosshairs.
What was Vader failing to do in those moments? Getting Luke into his crosshairs.
Why was Vader failing to get Luke into his crosshairs? Because of Luke's evasive maneuvers.

But if you're saying "no, that wasn't it", Treadwell, then what else could Vader have been basing his remark on?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol you are so worked up over this it’s hilarious

Not sure where you're able to interpret my emotional state, but hey, whatever tickles your pickle, I guess.

1. If Lebron James makes a shot that other experienced basketball players say is “impossible” he was using the force to an incredible, masterful degree? Lol

No, because in the real world, the Force doesn't exist. Your example isn't comparable. A better example in-universe would be Threepio's comment to Han about the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field, and Han doing it anyway, and then pointing out that that's not the Force. Except that example wouldn't really work, either, because the movie intentionally lampshades that Luke is able to make the shot because he uses the Force, and strongly implies that he has always had this ability.

2. Luke ends up using the Force to block Han's remote's shots with the lightsabre” - Yea that’s what the whole exercise is for, try to block the shots. There were shots he didn’t block too. After a conversation or a bit of instruction I could play a chord on a piano, does that mean I’m ready to play Carnegie Hall? Does that mean Luke is a Jedi master ready to take on the world?

Blocking a blaster shot with a lightsabre is the equivalent to playing a chord on a piano? Really? The implication from the film is that Luke is able to do this because he's exceptionally strong in the Force, and he picks up the concept very quickly. You're trying to argue that Luke is somehow not as "overpowered" as Rey is because he has to work to gain his abilities. I'm saying that Luke had exceptionally strong raw ability just like Rey did, and that he picked up techniques to use that raw ability quickly just like Rey did. And he did it without much tutoring, because he's exceptionally strong in the Force, just like Rey is. Therefore, Luke and Rey are comparable in their power levels, and arguments that Rey is "too" powerful aren't really supported by what's on screen in the films. It's just a gut feeling that people have, based on a double-standard.

3. Ok, so the time difference between ANH and ESB is a few years, so you don’t think it’s plausible that in a few YEARS time of practicing that Luke may have been able to struggle enough to pull his lightsaber to him? Again, how is that at ALL similar to Rey again? It took Luke years to be able to do that but she does it by the end of TFA! LOL

That's purely speculation on your part. Where's it supported in the films? Is it even addressed in the novelizations of the films? Within the films, within what we actually see, Luke is able to do a ton of stuff just...on his own. He isn't trained by anyone else. He's not given a manual of exercises to do. He doesn't have a Jedi holocron or whathaveyou to teach him. He just...does stuff. Same as Rey. If you want to claim that Rey gets her abilities too quickly, fine and dandy, but that also applies to Luke and Anakin just as much. And, for what it's worth, the novelization of TLJ apparently explains that when Ben mind-probes Rey, she manages to absorb his knowledge of Force techniques, which is why -- immediately after that point in the film, she's suddenly really good at using the Force. I tend not to put a lot of stock in novelizations (even though they're officially canon), but the info is out there.

You also talk about how strong Luke is already before he goes to see Yoda, but he still is almost killed by Vader, this after YEARS of practicing on his own and getting instruction from Yoda for an undetermined amount of time. Once again, NOTHING like Rey beating Kylo all on her own after what, a day or two? Lol

Again, you're assuming that Luke had years of practicing on his own. How do you know that Rey hasn't been doing the exact same thing all on her own during her years on Jakku? Both are equally valid assumptions, which is to say that neither are supported by anything we see in the films, and both are pure guesswork on either of our parts.

4. Oh you are really pulling at straws.. Anakin is a pilot BEFORE we meet him. Did he have some intuition because of the force? Yea I’m sure. Even you said the word yourself, UNCONSCIOUS. Was he flying races against other Force users that WERE trained and much more experienced AND STILL beating them? No? Another false equivalency.

It's in the movie itself. Qui-Gon says Anakin is immensely powerful. People say Anakin is the only human able to do the podraces at all, let alone win them. The implication here is -- or at least should be -- pretty obvious: he's able to do all this stuff because he can use the Force and because he's exceptionally powerful in using it.

Until you show me ANY character in the movies that over the course of DAYS goes from a non-force user, to having a hissy fit because a lightsaber gave her a scary dream, to doing Jedi mind tricks when she should and could not have any idea they were a thing or could be done, to beating a trained force user, to killing elite guards, to moving mountains of boulders with the force all with only a bit of a pep talk, the story of Rey will be the story of a Mary Sue. All the manufactured lines of dialogue that Rey says in order to “justify” her Mary Sue status doesn’t disprove her being exactly that.

Want to celebrate in the joy of all-powerful women? Go ahead, burn your bra and however else you want to celebrate. All your whining about fictitious double standards does little to convince me, or the scores of other fans out there that see it for what it is-KK’s agenda front and center.

Look, I'm not really interested in engaging with you on the whole issue of the "SJW agenda" and whatnot. I don't know whether you really, truly believe this sort of thing, or whether you're just kind of unsatisfied in a general sense about the films and this is the argument you've absorbed to try and provide what you think is a legitimate framework for your dissatisfaction. All I'm gonna say about that is you ain't doing yourself any favors when you trot that stuff out, and there's a reason why folks end up being dismissive of those views. You can claim that that's "insulting the fans," but I'd say the fans are being pretty insulting all on their own when they start making the "SJW agenda" argument, and are basically just getting back what they're giving.

At the end of the day, there's one standard at play here, and it's equally applicable to Luke and Rey and Anakin. They're all "overpowered." That's the point. They're supposed to be. They're all exceptional characters who are capable of doing things with the Force even without training, because they're exceptional. If Rey is a Mary Sue, then so are Anakin and Luke. Or, perhaps, they're just exceptional characters who are extremely skilled in the Force.

So giving the second movie in a trilogy to a writer/director and telling him there's a blank slate, who's fault was that?

I don't really see that as a fault. I mean, that was up to JJ and Kathleen Kennedy. They're the ones who chose to give Rian free reign. I like what he came up with. I like it a lot better than what JJ came up with, actually.

JJ did have ideas, we know he had a draft/treatment for VIII that wasn't used by Rian. We know he had an idea for Rey's parents, that LFL gave Rian veto power over by allowing him to do whatever he wanted. We know that JJ had a completely different vision for Luke's character in VIII. And we know that Rian asked JJ for changes in VII that JJ disagreed with and refused to do. I don't think it's fair to blame JJ for delivering a movie that had people talking and speculating for two years, and gave TLJ a hype lead-in that anyone would envy. Rian is the one who failed to bridge the gap between two consecutive movies in the same trilogy, which should have been the easier task.

That was kind of my point, though. Yes, JJ created a film that had people speculating. But it was speculation based on him engaging in this meta-narrative technique of withholding information that everyone within the story's framework already knows. The characters all know more than the audience. They know the answers to the "mysteries" that JJ introduced. The only reason they're "mysteries" at all is that JJ didn't have the characters engage with this information or provide it to the audience, and he did that specifically to build anticipation and excitement over trying to figure out the answers, rather than about the actual story or what the characters were doing. This is no different from a horror movie having a character slowly wander in a space, building up tense music to a crescendo, and then having a cat jump out from behind a trashcan to scare the character. It's using a particular technique to simulate a response in the audience, rather than doing the real thing. In the horror movie, you're simulating fear by using basic techniques to trigger the audience's fight-or-flight response...but nobody's actually afraid. In JJ's "mystery box" approach, you're simulating the audience's interest in the story by withholding information from them and having them become interested in the withheld information itself...but they aren't really all that interested in the actual story. The withheld information isn't really story, unless it's part of the characters' journey. The revelation of Rey's parents is only meaningful if Rey doesn't already know it herself. But JJ doesn't do any of the work to establish that Rey doesn't know who her parents are. Not once in TFA is there any indication that Rey (A) either has no idea who they even are, or (B) thinks the wrong thing about them (e.g. thinks that the people who left her on Jakku are mom and dad, but in fact it's someone else or she's a clone or whatever). JJ never shows what Rey knows or doesn't know. So, the audience's experience of finding this out is all about the audience's interaction with the information, rather than Rey.

It's not until TLJ that we start to find out what Rey thinks about her parents. She thinks (apparently) that they were junk traders who traded her away for drinking money, and are lying dead in a ditch somewhere on Jakku. And that belief is really important to Rey and her journey, specifically because (as the movie implies) she wants to find out they're something else to prove that she's more than just a nobody. She's looking to something external to give herself meaning in the galaxy...and what matters is that ultimately she creates that meaning for herself through her choices and actions. She defines herself, rather than being defined by something external (e.g., her parentage).

And here's what I think is the really cool part: even that could all still be wrong. There's actually nothing stopping JJ from doing a big reveal down the road that Rey's parents are something other than what Kylo Ren described them to be, and what she believes them to be. And while I would prefer that they actually are nobodies, I do think that Rey's journey and her self-creation will survive even if she draws additional strength from the knowledge of who her parents are. It won't (I hope) diminish the importance of her deciding on her own "I don't care who my parents were. I'm someone, and I'm choosing to take this path because it's the right path." So, even if Rey turns out to be a Kenobiwalker or whatever, the reveal will (again) be more for the audience and not for Rey. Rey's journey in relation to the identity of her parents is already basically done. A reveal of fabulously powerful heritage won't change that, although it'll change one of what I think is the underlying messages in TLJ: that anyone can be a hero, and that what matters is not where you come from, but who you choose to be. In other words, birth isn't destiny, and even a lowly stable hand can rise to be a hero without requiring the additional benefit of secretly being a prince or whathaveyou.


Luke's training was brief but at least he had training. Plus because there is a few years gap between ANH and ESB and Luke presumably sees Ben's ghost for the first time in the beginning of Empire, we can infer that any progress Luke has made in that time has been largely self taught. He BARELY is able to Force grab his saber in time in the Wampa cave.

Ok, here's the thing about the speculation on Luke's "home schooling" in the Force without a tutor. Even if that's the case....it still only supports the notion that Luke is incredibly powerful. To be able to teach yourself to use the Force, when there used to be entire academies dedicated to this task, suggests that Luke is a natural talent. That's fundamentally no different from, say, Anakin using the Force to fly podracers, or Rey using the Force to defeat Kylo Ren in a duel (after he'd been shot by a bowcaster that we've already seen can blow people, like, 40 feet backwards).

The whole battle with Vader in Empire was one sided. Vader could have killed him at any point but his motive was to convert him, not kill him. Plus Luke's lineage (aka Anakin Skywalker) would give a quick and reasonable explanation as to how Luke could hone his abilities. By the time of Return of the Jedi, Luke has made progress and has become as good of a Jedi Knight as he could ever be, though we can assume that he would never be as powerful as the Jedi of old because his teachings were so short lived.

Rey had no lineage to any Force user that we know of and apparently the Force created her. It's the same crappy idea recycled from Anakin in TPM and it's as stupid now as it was then. Plus she has no instruction of any kind. None whatsoever. Plus she never fails at her attempts to tap into the Force and isn't tempted to give in to the dark side.

Ok, so, hang on a second. Are you arguing that Anakin is a Mary Sue as well? And that, of the three of them, only Luke is the one who makes sense because the Force ought to be purely hereditary?

Also, as I mentioned above, we could still end up finding out that Rey has some fantastic lineage. I'd prefer that we didn't, but it could still happen. Jury's still out there.

Here are some key moments in Luke's journey that expose his flaws, show vulnerability, or instances where he must make a choice that will make him deal with his internal conflicts.

>snipped for space<

Those are just some examples of how Luke progresses as a character. We see his flaws, we see that he is vulnerable and we can relate to him. His ideas are challenged and by Return of the Jedi he is even tempted by the dark side which further escalates his struggle. The whole trilogy builds up to that one moment where he defies the Emperor by refusing to kill Vader. It's triumphant and such an emotionally satisfying peak for his character.

Look at all that we KNOW about Luke as a character, just by watching those three movies. By listing his flaws/ weaknesses and showing his conflicts we as the audience are invested in him because we see ourselves reflected in him. He BECOMES a Jedi by the end of the trilogy because the conflicts (both internal and external) have shaped him. The irony of seeing his weakness is that it actually makes him a stronger character because we witness the change.

I agree with all of this. These are good examples of Luke's journey as a character.

What have we learned about Rey thus far?

-She is a scavenger who trades junk for food.
-She lives alone on the wastes of Jakku waiting for the family that abandoned her to return.
--She is mechanically inclined so would have some idea how to fix things
-She is tough enough to defend herself because she does live alone on a harsh desert planet
-She can speak multiple languages because she interacts with lots of species of aliens on her world and at the junkyard
-She does the right thing by not selling BB-8 and generally looking out for him so she does have at least a conscience that she listens to
-Kylo Ren is able to paralyze her and knock her unconscious and just when we see that he is stronger than her in that moment, it is undone when she resists his mind probe later on, is able to tap into his mind and scare him by exposing his weakness. From there on out she is no longer vulnerable.

I think we've learned more than just that.

She did refuse the call-to-adventure like Luke, because she wanted to get back to Jakku, and I think this illustrates her biggest flaws.

I see Rey as having two problems. First, she's all bound up in waiting for her folks to come back, but that ties into the second larger problem, in that she's basically afraid for most of the films of taking responsibility, even though her instinct is to do so. That touches on her refusal to take the sabre, her refusal to embrace her power, and her attempt to literally hand off her responsibility to Luke at the end of TFA/start of TLJ. Rey looks outward to everyone else to "solve it." She's waiting on Jakku for her parents to come save her, thereby refusing to save herself. She wants to go back to Jakku for that reason, after seeing BB-8 off safely. She's unwilling to take up the mantle of the Jedi and turns down the sabre, then when she takes it, she only does so out of her transferred attachment to Han and desire for revenge, rather than for any larger good. Then she tries to get Luke to come back and save the galaxy. Up until her lessons from Luke and her cave vision, and her realization that Luke lied to her and refuses to save the galaxy, she repeatedly turns her back. It's only after the cave -- after she confronts her fears and overcomes them, and in so doing chooses to create her own path -- that she says "Well, screw it, then. I'll have to do it myself."

In many respects, I think this is more abstract and less obvious. It's much more of an internal conflict, and it drags on a lot longer than Luke's (although Luke had other flaws). And to be fair, we haven't seen if Rey's character traits remain flaws for her the way they did for Luke. There's still a third (or more?) movie(s) dealing with her in which that will be revealed.

Anyway, all that aside, I do want to say that I continue to enjoy discussing this stuff with you, Psab Keel. I may not agree with your assessments, but I appreciate your perspective.
 
[video]https://i.imgur.com/2a0SZpj.gif[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

Dumb and Dumber.jpg
Where are we gonna go? I'll tell you where. Someplace warm. A place where the blue milk flows like wine. Where beautiful women instinctively flock like the fathiers of Capistrano. I'm talking about a little place called Canto Bight.
 
I wasn't suggesting Anakin was a Mary Sue. I was just arguing the point that we had discussed at length before about the Force having a will and all that stuff, which I won't get into again here. As much as I don't care for Anakin as a character either, I can say that at least he had a flaw in that his anger and need to control things which led to his downfall.

A lot of my conflict with Rey's character has to do with the fact that the Dark Side side doesn't seem to have any effect on her in that she is not tempted by it or swayed in any way by it. It could also be that I never ever get the sense that she is in danger. I know she is the protagonist and that she will likely triumph but there is no tension that is keeping me invested in her struggles. This may change (along with her possible lineage) in Episode 9.

Honestly dude, I feel the same way. I know we may never see eye to eye on this movie or the series in a lot of regards but I do enjoy having the debate with you. I appreciate that you can dig deeper to more that just the surface level stuff. This is what the fandom is all about in my opinion and I keep engaging you because it's great to just hash story ideas out.
 
I think a lot of the discussion above stems in how differently the Force and being a Jedi are depicted in each trilogy. In the OT it’s more like a spiritual thing. Turning off your conscious self, while still being in control, resisting temptation. There’s a lot of mental aspect to it that Yoda and Ben say about the Force. That’s what being strong with the Force was at the core, jumping out of the freezing chamber is basically just a manifestation of that.
In the PT it’s quantifiable, like in a video game. If you have more Force points than others you’re stronger. “My powers have doubled since we last met, Count” and the like. Every lightsaber duel is basically just a boss fight, except for the Obi vs Anakin but that one is just so over the top that the emotional core quickly becomes secondary.
The ST, I don’t know to be honest. If we accept the ancillary material as canon and go by that being in the screenwriters’ mind then apparently the Force has its own conscious will now...
They’re three markedly different approaches to the same concept. Remember, Luke’s final trial of Jedi training was not how high he can Force-jump but facing Vader. It had to be a mental trial, facing temptation and what you fear the most. Yoda was telling him mostly to calm his temper, be patient and focused on Dagobah. In AOTC Yoda’s training is having 20 kids in one room with blasterballs and baby sized lightsabers deflecting shots like business as usual.
This is why I like the lightsaber fight in TFA a lot. There are emotions to it, there is a change in the state of mind to it, there is a story told and a duel of minds. The flashy sticks are just the representations as they should be, but if the above is true then it might not have been written as such.
 
And, for what it's worth, the novelization of TLJ apparently explains that when Ben mind-probes Rey, she manages to absorb his knowledge of Force techniques, which is why -- immediately after that point in the film, she's suddenly really good at using the Force.

I think this is such a cop-out way to justify Rey being able to be instantly powerful with the force. If this was the case then why do force users need to train at all? Why did they ever need to train with a master? They could have just did a Jedi mind meld and became instant Jedi.
This is all so horrible.
 
Very true,...hit the nail on the head

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuuDTnMPMgc

J
Three likes if I could. I remember thinking when BB-8 was playing whack-a-mole with that panel was like "is this the kind of movie it's gonna be?" and my first thoughts leaving the theatre were "well this could be salvaged with some re-edits and taking all the stupid jokes out"...the tone of this movie is one of my biggest problems. I said it many times the concepts and ideas I'm okay with it's the overall execution, motivations and the tone that gets me. Mind you it's funny he brings ROTS as a positive example when the first 20 minutes involves exciting space battle, slapstick comedy, brutal decapitation and severed limbs, smartass banter...but yea humour is okay to humanize a situation or to relief tension after an exciting scene but it's just odd and misfiring in this one. That bloody steam iron scene, I literally slapped my forehead and rolled my eyes as if I had a demonic possession...

I think this is such a cop-out way to justify Rey being able to be instantly powerful with the force. If this was the case then why do force users need to train at all? Why did they ever need to train with a master? They could have just did a Jedi mind meld and became instant Jedi.
This is all so horrible.

Yep, it's like when I saw dozens of articles popping up that "Snoke backstory is to be revealed in TLJ novelization", and I'm like, "oh, we're playing this now then"...
 
Yep, it's like when I saw dozens of articles popping up that "Snoke backstory is to be revealed in TLJ novelization", and I'm like, "oh, we're playing this now then"...

I'll say this: I hate the notion of "oh, just read the novel. It's all in there." I think that's a massive cop-out. Not because of the information that the novel imparts (whatever that may be), but because if it's that important, put it in the ******* movie already. I've said it before, but (surprise!) I lay this mostly at JJ's feet. He's done this crap before, with Star Trek. Oh, you have to read the novel/comic book/blah blah blah to understand WTF is going on.

Oh, really? Maybe, then, you should have put it in the ******* movie already. You know, instead of making it a "mystery" that's resolved by reading a comic book/novel/RPG sourcebook/tea leaves/thrown chicken bones/whatever. The one aside I'm willing to give in situations like this is that the information isn't relevant to the experience of the characters, and that inserting it would end up being jarring to the telling of the characters' story.

But I tend to think that the solution is to, you know, find a solution within the film that explains WTF is going on, without dropping a footnote that says "See, Anakin v. Dooku, 123 Gal.Ct. 525 (Gal. 1977)" or whatever. Basically, if you have to explain the joke to make it funny...maybe find another way to tell the joke.

So, in that respect alone, I agree with the notion of "It's awful and lazy to say 'Just read the novel'" to get the answer. That said, the actual answer itself is, you know, fine. Whatever. I don't really care that much. Rey hoovers up Kylo's knowledge of using the Force, because the Force wants her to. Ok. Fine. Here's hoping the "living Force" is explained better, but otherwise, fine. Just make it relevant to the story as a whole, instead of some obscure footnote that requires external reading.
 
I'll say this: I hate the notion of "oh, just read the novel. It's all in there." I think that's a massive cop-out. Not because of the information that the novel imparts (whatever that may be), but because if it's that important, put it in the ******* movie already. I've said it before, but (surprise!) I lay this mostly at JJ's feet. He's done this crap before, with Star Trek. Oh, you have to read the novel/comic book/blah blah blah to understand WTF is going on.
Did he? How did that go? I didn't think there was a lot of unexplained things in his Star Trek that had to be salvaged in a novelization. Then again, I sawi t like twice and never had any inclination to read the novelization.
I agree that the blame lays with the screenwriter but I doubt that either JJ or Rian was thinking "I have a perfectly fine explanation or reason, but for XYZ reason I'll just have it added to the comic adaptation/novelization". Instead it's probably more like someone in a board room read reviews and reactions after the movie came out and was like "well, we have 2 months til the novelization goes to print, so let me just call the editor if we can squeeze in 4 more paragraphs that expands on these issues. Might as well call them geek news sites to let them know that all this extra info is coming, hopefully this will sell more books too".
Much like a lot of things that were called out about TLJ and people were explaining plot points and stuff in interviews.

Oh, really? Maybe, then, you should have put it in the ******* movie already. You know, instead of making it a "mystery" that's resolved by reading a comic book/novel/RPG sourcebook/tea leaves/thrown chicken bones/whatever. The one aside I'm willing to give in situations like this is that the information isn't relevant to the experience of the characters, and that inserting it would end up being jarring to the telling of the characters' story.
Again, I don't think it was about the mystery, it's more like poor writing and oversight. Funny thing in particular about the Rey downloading the Force is (and I know you're not gonna like this) that it could have been set up as something that is resolved later...but for some reason someone thought it's better to call Alan Dean Foster and have him shoehorn this dumb explanation into the novel to tie that lose end.
But all in all, I agree with your post 100%.

I have to mention that there's another instance where "you have to read the book" comes in and that's when the book came first. Both instances are a result of poor screenwriting. First is when something was missing from the original film and there is an attempt to fix it after the movie's release, the other is when the adaptation is poor and crucial information is lost. I really wonder what people who never read the original books make out of the Harry Potter movies or Lynch's Dune...
 
Did he? How did that go? I didn't think there was a lot of unexplained things in his Star Trek that had to be salvaged in a novelization. Then again, I sawi t like twice and never had any inclination to read the novelization.

If memory serves, there was a "prequel" comic for the first JJ Trek film that was meant to explain how we get from the era of TNG/DS9/Voyager to the rebooted timeline, and it showed Spock going back in time with his red matter ship or whatever.

Part of the issue is that the stuff that gets left out and stuck in the comics/novelization is (in some cases) stuff that isn't immediately relevant to the story the characters are experiencing, but is really important to the audience in establishing how/why things are different from where we left off. So, it isn't really "necessary" for purposes of telling this particular story, but it is necessary for providing the audience with context and not treating events known across the galaxy as a "mystery" to be solved. So, all of the stuff about the difference between the Resistance and the Republic, where the First Order came from and how it got so freakin' powerful, what happened to Luke's Jedi academy, etc., etc., all of that could (and in my opinion should) be conveyed in the film. You don't have to have, like, some big history lesson about what happened between the films, but at least some better contextualization was necessary in TFA (in my opinion).

That, however, is different from some of the basic nuts-and-bolts stuff about "Why is Rey so powerful?" Unless that's specifically part of her journey and we as the audience are meant to share her ignorance and confusion, there's no reason to withhold it. A lot of that is JJ's fault, but I'll admit that Rian could've handled some of that better himself. A 2 second scene with Luke where he explains the concept of a "vergence" or whathaveyou could've helped. Or he could've simply described the Force having a will of its own an lifting up people seemingly at random, much like his own father, and much like himself. (e.g., "You see me as powerful, but there's no reason I had to be. It's all the will of the Force. In the early days of the Old Republic, Jedi were allowed to have children, and just as often as not, those children had no ability with the Force. But enough of them did, and enough of those children were sufficiently strong that the Republic grew fearful of them. The Jedi knew they could be wiped out of the Republic ever felt truly threatened by them, so they forbid marriage and children. But the Force found other ways, just as it always does...")

I agree that the blame lays with the screenwriter but I doubt that either JJ or Rian was thinking "I have a perfectly fine explanation or reason, but for XYZ reason I'll just have it added to the comic adaptation/novelization". Instead it's probably more like someone in a board room read reviews and reactions after the movie came out and was like "well, we have 2 months til the novelization goes to print, so let me just call the editor if we can squeeze in 4 more paragraphs that expands on these issues. Might as well call them geek news sites to let them know that all this extra info is coming, hopefully this will sell more books too".
Much like a lot of things that were called out about TLJ and people were explaining plot points and stuff in interviews.

A lot of the time I think it's related to pacing and editing. And I think it's also tied to the issue of the focus of the story, like I discussed above. I still think some of that needs to be managed, though.

I have to mention that there's another instance where "you have to read the book" comes in and that's when the book came first. Both instances are a result of poor screenwriting. First is when something was missing from the original film and there is an attempt to fix it after the movie's release, the other is when the adaptation is poor and crucial information is lost. I really wonder what people who never read the original books make out of the Harry Potter movies or Lynch's Dune...

I watched Dune before I read it, and I really enjoyed it. Over time, though, I've come to believe that the book is essentially unfilmable. It's just too dense to get across everything that's important, much like Watchmen. You can do it, but it still doesn't do the work justice.
 
This thread is more than 3 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top