Solid teaser. I enjoyed every second of it.
Yes and no.
Partly true.I imagine a big part of why the first did so poorly was because Deckard is not really a likable hero character.
Yes and no.
The information you seek can be found at the propsummit forum.
I just have to warn you that getting this prop can be a hazardous journey.
This one is mine.
http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/...6-69FF-4404-8B1B-017B3904482B_zpsmqugnje7.jpg
The original hero was cobbled from a Charter Arms bulldog frame and a Styer Mannlicher SL receiver. Add a generous sprinkling of greeblie-dust and voila.Oh I'm quite aware, was mostly asking if anyone could identify it as a particular maker, or if it looked like it was built the real way. Sounds like they did it right.
the ambiguity about Deckard being a human/replicant won't be spoiled.
Thirty years after the events of the first film
*folds arms, sits back, and waits for someone to talk their way out of that corner*
As an avid hater of the idea that Deckard is a replicant, I will still back up that I don't think the 4 year life span applies....
Deckard and Rachel were special cases... Rachel was the newest model and took the longest to fail the Voight-Kanpff test... IF Deckard too is a replicant, then we can assume he is a special case like Rachel... I mean he's a replicant created and given memories to kill replicants... let's give him a longer life span.
And clearly Tyrell wasn't worried about breaking rules. In the cut scenes Deckard finds out that Tyrell's real body is frozen and the Tyrell that was killed by Roy was a replicant as well.
"More Human than Human" at what point does the Tyrell Corporation say that a 4 year life span isn't very human.... and start breaking rules.