Re: Bandai 1/72 Millennium Falcon
Maybe you can point out what exactly I did, because I'm still trying to figure it out. Where was I "trying to be an expert". The only thing I can find is you refuting something I posed about the engine lighting that Bandai said. I'm not sure how I come off as an expert in this post with all the question marks.
"So is it total RPF folklore then that the engine vents were functional in order to cool the engine lighting? I always assumed that there were engine lights. Didn't the Bandai crew that examined the model say that they were white lights?"
Then there was your post right after.
"Bandai said the engine lights in the film were white. That is, as you see them in the film. They said nothing about the model being lit. I seem to remember that the engine glow was rotoscoped in."
I ask, who is coming across as the expert?
Following this post multiple people said the engines were lit also, yet I'm the one that is arrogant and an "expert"? Anyone who actually knows me on these boards, knows that I am not this way. I would invite you to ask yourself if I really said anything that was different than anyone else? Who is the one calling people out by name and criticizing them publicly? This is the last I will say of it so these people can concentrate on the subject at hand. I refuse to be bullied by someone sitting behind a keyboard.
Maybe you can point out what exactly I did, because I'm still trying to figure it out. Where was I "trying to be an expert". The only thing I can find is you refuting something I posed about the engine lighting that Bandai said. I'm not sure how I come off as an expert in this post with all the question marks.
"So is it total RPF folklore then that the engine vents were functional in order to cool the engine lighting? I always assumed that there were engine lights. Didn't the Bandai crew that examined the model say that they were white lights?"
Then there was your post right after.
"Bandai said the engine lights in the film were white. That is, as you see them in the film. They said nothing about the model being lit. I seem to remember that the engine glow was rotoscoped in."
I ask, who is coming across as the expert?
Following this post multiple people said the engines were lit also, yet I'm the one that is arrogant and an "expert"? Anyone who actually knows me on these boards, knows that I am not this way. I would invite you to ask yourself if I really said anything that was different than anyone else? Who is the one calling people out by name and criticizing them publicly? This is the last I will say of it so these people can concentrate on the subject at hand. I refuse to be bullied by someone sitting behind a keyboard.
