KrangPrime
Master Member
I'm genuinely sorry that you don't enjoy this interpretation. But I also believe it's bloody silly to claim that anyone that does is having the wool pulled over their eyes. That is what agitates me, man. Don't dismiss other peoples enjoyment. Everyone loves to believe that they're the one true claimant to a single truth.
.
Even I can agree with this.
As much as Ihate this movie and this interpretation of the character... I can see some things to like about it.
Amy Adams is an adorable lois lane. I just wish they made her a little..tougher.... I remember her in MOS and this movie as being a little..whimsical looking, like she's watching a movie rather an participating in it......
Henry Cavil has the potential to be a good superman if he was given better material to work with.
So I can see why people can enjoy this version at least.
other movies, not so much, but this one i can ;o)
for other movies i will go down to the grave wondering WHY some people like it, and explaining over and over to them again why they SHOULDN'T like it..
but no ones saying they CAN'T like it. ;o)
for a second there, i thought i wandered into another thread. i was having post traumatic stress reactions ;o)
regarding this true fan nonsense. wouldn't it be less loaded simply to say the mo vie is not 'true to the franchise?' in cases like feigbusters and bay turtles, where an outside source comes in, is combative to fans, or creators of the franchise....and clearly doesn't take any effort to understand what makes it work at all? it's a little friendlier term than that other loaded one that should probably vanish forever...