^ True. At the same time, there's... an established range, I suppose, for lack of better terminology, for how to craft any given idea into a story, and any given story into a script, and so on. The pacing, the beats, how long to spend establishing the old status quo before "something happens" to launch the protagonist on their arc, how long to develop the complexity of the challenge, where to put the twist, how long after the climax to spend on the coda and establishing the new status quo, etc. There's only so long you can go with any portion of that, with a film, before the audience gets bored. Conversely, if not enough time is spent on each of those beats, the audience can too easily be lost. Good filmmakers can keep an audience's interest for any length of time.
All of that, though, depends on so much. Production design (sets and costumes and props and so forth), cinematography (the visual "style" of the film, from color saturation to aspect ratio to shot and scene changes, etc.), writing, acting, directing, editing... And here's where I think the fans and armchair filmmakers have a legitimate gripe. Early on, George understood his weaknesses and shored them up with people who were strong in those areas. That changed after Empire. Also, throughout, he's said he got into movies because he loves editing and the ability that gives one to control what the audience sees and how fast they experience it. I honestly think if he'd gotten a good director (or directors) for the Prequels, and for those and ROTJ had turned them loose to generate several hundred alternate takes and camera angles and focal lengths and so forth of any given shot, he'd have possibly made some really nice finished films. The problems crept in when he tackled more of the writing (which he acknowledges he isn't good at and doesn't like to do) and directing (which he acknowledges he isn't good at and doesn't like to do). But he felt all of that was necessary to control the raw material he got in the editing booth.
He had some really great initial ideas. When those got refined into the scripts for Star Wars and Empire, with assistance from others who are better at turning ideas into stories than he, we ended up with some really good results. But when he started having to do all of it himself (and I count hiring people who won't really ever disagree with him as "doing it himself"), it became much more scattershot -- a string of vignettes, rather than an organic narrative...
I can't speak for others, but I've spent a large portion of my life studying storytelling, learning how to not write badly by trial and much error, and making it a decent way through film school before money became an insurmountable obstacle. So while yes, ultimately, it
is a very subjective thing, I think I have a ballpark notion of what that thing might be. At a sort of "put up or shut up" request, I've been re-transcribing my rewrites of everything post-Empire (the four films that were to have followed from the Adventures of Luke Skywalker, and the six films that would have gone back and told the beginning of the saga, from the Adventures of Obi-Wan Kenobi), going by what I'd been able to glean from George's notes and interviews through the '80s and '90s, and incorporating some of the more organic elements from the Prequels, Special Editions, and Expanded Universe. I think it says much that everyone who's seen those treatments/scripts (as the particular case may be) have found them substantially better than the last four films we got. [Side note: Sorry it's taking me so long to get these into my new computer. Real Life
does unfortunately take precedence...]
All of which means I do think I've learned a bit about good and bad storytelling, how to craft a structurally sound film, and -- most germane -- how to do a good Star Wars movie. I try to avoid Lucas-bashing (well... George-bashing, anyway --
Katie Lucas, on the other hand...), I try to give a more well-rounded critique of the Prequels beyond "they suck", and all evolving out of a decade-and-a-half-long introspection into what felt "off" to me when I first saw ROTJ in the theater. I also am not pre-emptively ranting about what's wrong with TFA or saying what JJ and Company should or should not be doing. I've read the interviews and listened to them and the actors talk about the film and I have a strong feeling they know what they're doing.
After it opens, and I see it at least once, I'm going to start digging for making-of and behind-the-scenes books and magazines and featurettes to better understand the whys and wherefores of whatever they end up doing and not doing.
Then I might start second-guessing some of their choices. But not before.
Meanwhile...
seelsa73, if you don't want spoilers, you're in the wrong thread. I don't get how you don't mind spoilers for the main event, but the ancillary material is no-go territory for you. :behave Hurry up and read 3 and 4, darn it -- they've been out for
days!
--Jonah