Solo4114
Master Member
This makes me wonder if LFL and Lucas were viewing the restoration work on uncalibrated monitors and not in the restoration studio/workstations. So maybe on their monitors the blacks initially looked bright and not particularly dark and they tell the restoration folks to darken the blacks. Certainly the restorers question what Lucas et al are talking about but, hey, the customer is always right, correct? So they darken the blacks more which results in crushed blacks on a properly calibrated monitor but on the LFL crap monitors they look fine.
I think it was all about hiding matt boxes and things that show up on video,...but not on film....The 97 SE print isn't as bad as the Lowry 'cleaned up' one
J
What I seem to recall (and I may be wrong here) is that Lowry (now Reliance) scanned and restored the negatives or interpositives to do the 2004 SEs. However, the CGI work, and a lot of the actual cleanup and color timing was done by LFL, not Lowry.
If you look at Lowry's other work, I'm inclined to lay the blame squarely at LFL's doorstep. Lowry did the Bond blu-ray restorations, as well as North by Northwest, all of which look gorgeous. (Although some have complained a bit about the DNR used in North by Northwest, I think?) Anyway Lowry/Reliance has a solid track record, so I think LFL was more to blame. Either way, it was a crappy, amateurish job.