Riceball
Master Member
Maybe in the Corps they do (I swear they're officers are treated like the British treat theirs, as landed gentry to be held in awe. The Army doesn't roll like that). But I never heard a 1LT use the full rank ever unless in a official capacity like ID purposes and such. Never in normal conversation.
In my experience Marine officers aren't treated all that much in awe, no more so than any other branch of service, in fact I'd argue that our officers are more grounded than the average officer of any other branch. One of the key tenants of Marine Corps leadership and something that is taught at all levels of the Corps is troop welfare and is only second to mission accomplishment. In the field this means that if we are served hot chow the line forms in reverse order of rank with the lowest Private being first in line and our officers and senior Staff NCOs doing the serving. We're also the only branch of service where being a ring knocker really doesn't mean a whole lot and doesn't help nearly as much in promotions as it does in the other services, out of 34 Commandants only 9 of them had been Annapolis grads.
Getting back on topic, I've always found it annoying when movie producers roll the roles of a carrier's CAG & CO into one and in some cases, like Top Gun, add in a dash of squadron CO for good measure. They don't seem to realize that a carrier Captain has little to do with aircraft operations and that job belongs to the CAG and likewise the CAG has nothing to do with running the ship.
Another thing that's annoying that happened way too often in Trek from TNG on is the notion of an Admiral commanding a starship along with a task force. Sorry, but Admirals don't command ships, they're in charge of the fleet or task force and don't have the time to worry about the minutiae of controlling a single ship, not even their own flagship. They're supposed to be on the flag bridge where they can keep an eye on the bigger picture while the flagship's captain worries about fighting the flagship.