Richard Baker
Sr Member
IIRC that laser sight Arnold used in the first movie didn't really exist at the time. They mounted a laser on the gun but he had to have a cable running down his sleeve to a box on the floor to make it work.
And in both cases the story beats are the same.Yeah, that's one of those things where it's not so much "1 was better than 2" or vice versa. They're different genre films, same as ALIEN vs ALIENS. In both cases, the first films were suspense/horror films. And in both cases, the sequels were thriller/action films.
At least its spelled correctly, and not "darc f8" or something stupid like "genisys"."Dark Fate"? That's the best they could come up with? It's terrible.
At least its spelled correctly, and not "darc f8" or something stupid like "genisys".
Now that is an interesting premise...It should have been “No Fate”
I expect the story to be that John has died and Sarah is now trying to survive to fill his role within the human resistance and stop Judgement Day.
There are only two Terminator films in my opinion.
There are only two Terminator films in my opinion. Terminator and Judgement Day. I saw Salvation and thought it was ok. Some interesting ideas but it was only so so. Other than that I don't see the point of making more of these.
Same here. I watched the trailer with my wife and she was completely unimpressed. The franchise ended with Judgement Day. All of the rest has been garbage.
SCC was good. . .
Old quote I know, but the guys at SureFire were actually able to hook the laser up to a battery hidden in a pocket in Arnold’s M65.a box on the floor to make it work.