the only issue is, you can't ignore the results....
hey, hey, you like Taco Bell that's fine but you can't deny what that stuff does to your stomach. LoL.I just happen to like the real thing baby! Fresh Beef, Fresh Chicken, Fresh Habaneros...I like my Taco's Fresh and homemade with love and passion behind it....you know what i'm saying? Not stuff frrom a manufacturing plant, microwaved right before you eat it. That's why i won't even think about going there any more. Even the thought gives me the runs...lol. I just get more entertainment being light hearted and joking about it. lolon that note, CopperRevan why you so harsh on Taco Bell bro, they didn't force you to eat it, you could have just ignored it and went over to chipotle and got some family friendly foods made for kids...... Then flush and repeat.....
See, the bots got nothing new, same sad story, same fake excuses, then flush and repeat.
But, the flush and repeat sounds so much better with me defending Tbell and Chi-fire.
hey, hey, you like Taco Bell that's fine but you can't deny what that stuff does to your stomach. LoL.I just happen to like the real thing baby! Fresh Beef, Fresh Chicken, Fresh Habaneros...I like my Taco's Fresh and homemade with love and passion behind it....you know what i'm saying? Not stuff frrom a manufacturing plant, microwaved right before you eat it. That's why i won't even think about going there any more. Even the thought gives me the runs...lol. I just get more entertainment being light hearted and joking about it. lol
It isn't anything new. Don't forget all the shows of the late 90's early 00's and into the 10's where the main lead is a criminal, cop or otherwise criminal anti-hero. Sopranos, The Shield, Ray Donovan, etc and yea Game of Thrones. I enjoy complicated characters as much as anyone else, and grey characters are usually much more relatable. But I have a hard time rooting for someone who is in actuality a villain and it can lose me as a fan of the character as I get less sympathetic for them when I want to root for them as a hero. Not saying these shows shouldn't be made and I know that the fall of the main character is often an arc of these stories, I just wanted to bring up that they seem to be what's popular and prevalent in today's entertainment.The good guy bad guy thing became trendy after GOT Jammie Lanister craze. No one has been able to replicate it though, just Walmart versions of it.
I feel they use it when they don't know how to write a morally compelling character, good or bad.These days moral ambiguity in fiction is used with the same frequency that some people drown their food with Sriracha. Too often it's used to mask an otherwise bland meal.
I agree: maybe the whole point IS destroying the hero, so they can use the villain to become their new hero and change the narrative of the story to suit their desired morality.my issue isn't character arc, it is the character having the same face and name but now written as a completely different character. No triggering event, no cause, no time lapse, just a totally different character. Anakin has an arc. (OK, killing kids is still a no go for his character, no arc there, just a poor decision in writing) The wicked witch from sleeping beauty does not, they just made the evil witch the good person and all the good people are now evil. No arc, just a hatred for good while praising evil and abusing an old story for shock value on an audience that loved the original. Not an anti hero, although I appreciated the examples given above of similar bad guys suddenly doing good (definite trope) but this Disney thing is not that. They are taking a known evil character and rewriting it entirely as though that person is the good one including the previous storyline. There is no purpose for this other than to destroy the original story. It is a negation of historic media in order to eliminate the original message. They don't show a redemption moment like the 80s and 90s anti hero movies, they just go to the backstory and swap it with the good character. OK, so now it is the same story but everyone swapped bodies. That served what purpose? The bodies they swapped into are obvious stereotypes of known evil/good from our collective past but now we are supposed to think those character types are now flipped? The dark evil is now the hero.
This all can be summed up easily. They could have written a totally new story and used totally new characters and names and lands..... But they don't. They purposely destroy known and loved stories that are decades even centuries old. It is not a character type or "similar" to this other story we heard in (insert time frame here), this is the purposed hijacking of someone else's work for the sole purpose of destroying it and saying "up yours" to all that liked it in its original form. And no, it isn't a rewrite or a reboot or a remake, those would all have only differences in flavor, not a completely different story under the guise of the original. I could remake star wars as a steam punk era story and the characters would be the same loved characters but using completely different actors, effects, costumes and dialogue. The base story would still be the same plotline. Sorry, no one is convincing me that these atrocities are normal writing behavior. No remake purposes to destroy the original plotline of an otherwise staggeringly epic and successful story and not be called an utter failure.
Wow, yes, and you said that waaaay better than I did.I agree: maybe the whole point IS destroying the hero, so they can use the villain to become their new hero and change the narrative of the story to suit their desired morality.
I argue that it's a de-construction of History that's happening in our Western society as a whole. History, as written, can be ignored, trampled on, crushed to oblivion if the facts/truths don't agree with a certain Socio-Political narrative that we're experiencing for decades now.I agree: maybe the whole point IS destroying the hero, so they can use the villain to become their new hero and change the narrative of the story to suit their desired morality.
I argue that it's a de-construction of History that's happening in our Western society as a whole. History, as written, can be ignored, trampled on, crushed to oblivion if the facts/truths don't agree with a certain Socio-Political narrative that we're experiencing for decades now.
I certainly don't want to extrapolate on that subject since it'll veer off to the highly political discourse
I think my post should go in a different thread...lol.