Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Pre-release)

Re: Star Wars Episode VII

So people may have better results asking for the release of The Original Trilogy in 4K instead of just asking for unaltered versions?

The original unaltered trilogy in 4K, yes. I think that it's just an added bonus, since even if Disney chooses to release the SEs in 4K, they'll have to re-scan the unaltered originals anyway, then re-do all the digital effects that were done before, and rehab all the additional scenes.

I think it's highly unlikely we'll get the unaltered OOT (that's "Original Original Trilogy") on blu-ray, unless it happens while they're rescanning the material for 4K transfer anyway and is released in anticipation of the NT.

But that said, I think it's a no-brainer that they'll release a version of it whenever we hit the next home video format in higher res. there are already 2K and 4K displays, so it's only a matter of time.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

The other thing to consider is whether or not 4k really takes off. The fact of the matter is, most people don't need a 4k TV, and for most folks (i.e., the vast majority who bought a TV 60" or smaller) buying a 4k TV is a complete waste of money. At that size, jamming more pixels into the display actually doesn't make a difference.

to wit: Why Ultra HD 4K TVs are still stupid | TV and Home Theater - CNET Reviews

More to the point though, I haven't seen one iota of evidence that Disney is even considering this. There's not one statement that I've seen that could even be inferred to be discussing the possibility. All it is, is fan speculation.

Two things.


First, at some point in the late 90s, early 2000s, you probably could've said to someone "Man, blu-ray is just never gonna take off. Unless you have a display that's larger than 42" or so, why would you bother? DVD's fine." And then along came +50" displays and DVD just wasn't good enough. While there's likely an upper limit to display panel sizes, I could easily see a 65" set becoming "standard" some day, and the 80" being the "high-end" model. That won't be for a while, but it could happen pretty easily given time. Never underestimate the need in the consumer electronics industry to sell people new stuff, nor their genius in actually convincing people they want to buy it.

Second, of course it's purely fan speculation at this point. I don't think anyone's saying Disney's said they'll do it. Quite the contrary. But it's also a no-brainer that, if they do a 4K scan, they release an OOT alongside the SEs, or in separate packaging. I mean, why wouldn't they, if they have to scan it all in anyway? That'd be going back to the late 90s and refusing to release a widescreen version of a recently remastered film, and only being willing to release the pan-and-scan version. You'd have to scan the widescreen version anyway to do the pan-and-scan version, so why not just...release both?
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Two things.


First, at some point in the late 90s, early 2000s, you probably could've said to someone "Man, blu-ray is just never gonna take off. Unless you have a display that's larger than 42" or so, why would you bother? DVD's fine." And then along came +50" displays and DVD just wasn't good enough. While there's likely an upper limit to display panel sizes, I could easily see a 65" set becoming "standard" some day, and the 80" being the "high-end" model. That won't be for a while, but it could happen pretty easily given time. Never underestimate the need in the consumer electronics industry to sell people new stuff, nor their genius in actually convincing people they want to buy it.

Second, of course it's purely fan speculation at this point. I don't think anyone's saying Disney's said they'll do it. Quite the contrary. But it's also a no-brainer that, if they do a 4K scan, they release an OOT alongside the SEs, or in separate packaging. I mean, why wouldn't they, if they have to scan it all in anyway? That'd be going back to the late 90s and refusing to release a widescreen version of a recently remastered film, and only being willing to release the pan-and-scan version. You'd have to scan the widescreen version anyway to do the pan-and-scan version, so why not just...release both?

I think the cnet article raises some important points about screen size and consumer preference.

Who is to say that they'll not do it, to not **** off George? Who's to say that it wasn't in the terms of sale that they never release the OOT?

Why not just release both? Because those who want the OOT are a niche market.

Let me analogize to something outside the entertainment industry. Another forum I post on is The Fedora Lounge, it's a collection of gentlemen who like fedoras (I guess the name is a dead giveaway). Not the newly popular hipster ones (the bane of my existence!), but guys who collect vintage fur felt hats from the late 1800's through until about 1970 when things really started going down hill. Back in the day, hats were sold "open crown" that is, unshaped. You would go to a haberdasher, whom would help you pick out a hat that complimented one's build, and it would be creased to the wearer's preference. 99% of all men's hats sold today are pre-creased, that is, they are molded into their final shape by the actual machinery.

Alongside an overall decrease in quality in modern hats , one of the reasons those guys and myself prefer vintage hats is this ability to shape the hats how we like.

This is a group of guys who have begged, and tried to work with Stetson, on the manufacture of a new "open crown" hat (consumers and retailers!). They've been rebuffed every time. Stetson actually did release an "open crown" hat a few years ago, but discontinued it because of poor sales (they sold less than 300 over the course of a year). And then every so often, someone new comes on the board and says "look at all of us here, Stetson must not want to sell to us!"

All of which is to say, it's easy to overestimate the demand for something when you really want it. Don't get me wrong, I would love to be proven wrong on this, and I'll be in line with you guys if Disney does ever release an unaltered original trilogy. But I'm not waiting on baited breath, and I certainly don't expect them to do it. Just because there is a market, doesn't mean that it's a market big enough for Disney to care about.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

So people may have better results asking for the release of The Original Trilogy in 4K instead of just asking for unaltered versions?

Totally. STAR WARS (AKA A NEW HOPE) deserved a 4K scan, sadly the same 1080P transfer originally made the 2004 was used for the BDs. As I understand it, the original film grain was scrubbed and a digital 'floating grain" added over the top to help 'blend in" the digital re-do effects of the 1997 release.

Do we need 4K in the home? Probably not in the home. D-Cinema, yes. 4K scans converted to 1080P do look better than 2K scans of the same program.

Slightly OT, I have just joined the 501st and bought a armour kit and watched SW4 looking for tips on the costumes. There was tape holding legs together and one trooper doesn't even have decals.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Why not just release both? Because those who want the OOT are a niche market.

Yes, but a much larger niche market than most and VERY loud. To the point that they released them in 2006 to try and stem the OOT piracy going on. Also, in the past five years large companies have been focusing more and more on niche markets to great financial success.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

But not so loud or powerful that we got it on bluray.

I never said powerful, just loud. Star Wars fans being upset with George Lucas is now a part of pop culture. The fact that it was even available as a bonus disc in 2006 says volumes about Lucasfilm knowing there's a market for the films GL never wanted to see the light of day again.

Now he's out of the picture and Disney will have the video rights in 2020.

I've long said that we won't get the OOT remastered until GL passes away. I still think that's the case. I'd watch for a 50th anniversary release in whatever format is popular in 2027.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Another boxed set with Episodes 1-9 but no originals, only special editions? Again?!

If 7-9 are worth buying, I'll get just those. A 1-9 boxed set without the OOT would have to contain a real working lightsaber to get me to buy the special editions and prequels again.
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

You just managed to make the PT sound appealing...

You may have won the internet with that.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I think the cnet article raises some important points about screen size and consumer preference.

Who is to say that they'll not do it, to not **** off George? Who's to say that it wasn't in the terms of sale that they never release the OOT?

Why not just release both? Because those who want the OOT are a niche market.

True. But the real question, as I see it, isn't the size of the market, but rather the cost to the manufacturer. I'll get to that in a second, though.

Let me analogize to something outside the entertainment industry. Another forum I post on is The Fedora Lounge, it's a collection of gentlemen who like fedoras (I guess the name is a dead giveaway). Not the newly popular hipster ones (the bane of my existence!), but guys who collect vintage fur felt hats from the late 1800's through until about 1970 when things really started going down hill.

Trilbys and stingy-brims don't count as fedoras, in my opinion. You need at least 2.5", dimensionally cut, depending on the hat and the person wearing it. Take heart, however, in the fact that it seems the ironic trucker hat may be moving towards becoming the hipster chapeau of choice. ;)

Back in the day, hats were sold "open crown" that is, unshaped. You would go to a haberdasher, whom would help you pick out a hat that complimented one's build, and it would be creased to the wearer's preference. 99% of all men's hats sold today are pre-creased, that is, they are molded into their final shape by the actual machinery.

Alongside an overall decrease in quality in modern hats , one of the reasons those guys and myself prefer vintage hats is this ability to shape the hats how we like.

Why don't you just buy from hatsdirect and bash it yourself? That's what I did. :) Oh, and if you're ever in Billings, MT, head over to Rand's for some awesome custom hats. They're mostly western stuff, but they'll do a custom job on their European Clay that works terrifically. But I digress.

This is a group of guys who have begged, and tried to work with Stetson, on the manufacture of a new "open crown" hat (consumers and retailers!). They've been rebuffed every time. Stetson actually did release an "open crown" hat a few years ago, but discontinued it because of poor sales (they sold less than 300 over the course of a year). And then every so often, someone new comes on the board and says "look at all of us here, Stetson must not want to sell to us!"

All of which is to say, it's easy to overestimate the demand for something when you really want it. Don't get me wrong, I would love to be proven wrong on this, and I'll be in line with you guys if Disney does ever release an unaltered original trilogy. But I'm not waiting on baited breath, and I certainly don't expect them to do it. Just because there is a market, doesn't mean that it's a market big enough for Disney to care about.

Right, but there's a few things at play with Stetson that don't really apply in the Disney case.

With Stetson, you're talking about a manufacturing process, requiring a fair bit of automated machinery with some human presence at the factory, too. It would probably be more expensive for them to hire people to physically remove a specific selection of unbashed hats. Then there's the question of which hats you're pulling out unbashed. Do you only pull one specific line of hats? In which colors? How much inventory do you set aside to do this? How much of it will go unsold? Plus, the unbashed hats are not merely something that the vast bulk of the market isn't interested in, but are something that they'd actively avoid. PLUS we have no idea what the actual assembly process even is. My bet would be that the automated process has a series of molds using steam and they simply cut and press the hat in stages, then add the liner and sweat band, and cap it off with the ribbon. You might even have to interrupt the actual manufacturing process -- or alter the machine program to skip a step or somesuch -- just to get unbashed hats out of the normal run. Who knows.

With Blu-ray manufacturing, though, it's a different story. Your physical costs for the discs are identical. All you're doing is mass-burning discs, then slapping labels on them and sticking them into a case. Your case and labels are probably your most expensive step, but even that's a low-level thing. The real expense assumed would be in deciding how to handle the initial scan. Would you scan the entire original and clean it up, then go back and add SE effects and scenes? Or would you try to figure out some way to work with the 1080p masters of the SEs and "upscale" the whole thing using some algorithm? Put simply, if they go with the rescan at 4K, and then redo all the f/x and added scenes for the SE content, there's no reason not to simply save an un-specialized version of the file, and then add the SE stuff after.

Once you do that, it's just the matter of dedicating some of your burners to do non-SE burns. Moreover, releasing a version of Star Wars without the special edition stuff would, unlike the unbashed fedora, not mean squat to most consumers. I'd bet they wouldn't even really be able to tell the difference unless they were hardcore fans like us. I mean, think about it. Would you expect people in the fan community to complain if the roles of the OOT and SEs were reversed when we hit higher res home formats? Like, where the SEs are only available in the lower-res (BD) format, and the OOT is now available in the higher res? I kinda doubt people would care that much. I mean, I could be wrong, and I'm admittedly guessing at the process of DVD/BD manufacturing, but it strikes me that the only real additional expense you take on is the packaging. You don't have added process expenses, and it's already been demonstrated that there's a market for the stuff.

There's also the little matter of piracy to consider. When you're talking about hats, pretty much, the only way to get a Stetson hat is to get it from the Stetson corporation. With the OT, there ARE 35mm prints (and other sizes) floating around out there. It's not a stretch to think that the same thing we saw with the LD rips prior to 2006 would happen with a de-specialized high-res edition. And we've already seen how LucasFilm -- even WITH Lucas himself at the helm -- responded to that.

Lastly, let's be honest. George is a consultant, sure, but Disney holds the purse strings now. And George signed over the rights to the films. He created 'em, sure, but he doesn't OWN them anymore. They are no longer "his stories." So, while they could be nice and respect him, I rather doubt they're REQUIRED to do that. Unless there's something in the agreement of sale that acts like an easement would on real property, I can't imagine there's anything other than good intentions to stop Disney from doing whatever it pleases. Put simply, if the only thing holding them back is George's hurt feelings....George better invest in some tissues.


Yes, but a much larger niche market than most and VERY loud. To the point that they released them in 2006 to try and stem the OOT piracy going on. Also, in the past five years large companies have been focusing more and more on niche markets to great financial success.

Exactly. Plus, as I've discussed, there's the issue of "It wouldn't really cost us anything to do it, other than packaging." They could even charge a higher price for a super-special 9-volume, 12-disc version of the series, just to guarantee that those of us who are hardasses about the PT and SEs would buy 'em. And dammit, much as I hate to admit it...I'd buy it! And then lock the PTs and SEs in a vault. :p

But not so loud or powerful that we got it on bluray.

But again, that was while Lucas was still at the helm and they were "his" stories. They aren't his anymore, so the issue of his ego is potentially much diminished, if not eliminated altogether.

Another boxed set with Episodes 1-9 but no originals, only special editions? Again?!

If 7-9 are worth buying, I'll get just those. A 1-9 boxed set without the OOT would have to contain a real working lightsaber to get me to buy the special editions and prequels again.

That'd assume they'll release them in separate boxes. I wouldn't be so sure that the OOT would be released in a separate box. At the very least, I can see them requiring you to pay extra and buy the SEs, at least on initial release, if not the whole nonology.

Also, I'd rather have a working E-11 or better still a DL-44. :)
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

That'd assume they'll release them in separate boxes. I wouldn't be so sure that the OOT would be released in a separate box. At the very least, I can see them requiring you to pay extra and buy the SEs, at least on initial release, if not the whole nonology.

Definitely. I don't think you'll ever get a stand alone release of the originals. Only as part of a larger set and yes, I'd buy it too.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

That'd assume they'll release them in separate boxes. I wouldn't be so sure that the OOT would be released in a separate box. At the very least, I can see them requiring you to pay extra and buy the SEs, at least on initial release, if not the whole nonology.

Also, I'd rather have a working E-11 or better still a DL-44. :)

I was referring to only buying 7-9 as opposed to another boxed set of 1-9, unless it contained the OOT..... or a real working lightsaber.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I was referring to only buying 7-9 as opposed to another boxed set of 1-9, unless it contained the OOT..... or a real working lightsaber.

I'm with you... Lightsaber over E-11 (although either would get me to buy the box set I must admit!) :)
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I'm with you... Lightsaber over E-11 (although either would get me to buy the box set I must admit!) :)

Well I think if I got the lightsaber I'd be spending the next day in the hospital, so while that would be my first choice, I'm going with E11. Either way I want a copy of the original OT.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

I know I'm in the minority here, but I actually like the YIJC, if only because I dig history. I don't treat it as "Indy," really, but I enjoy it all the same. It's like a separate thing for me.

I watched it in the 90's as a youngling and really liked it. Then 2 years ago I bought the three box set, watched the whole thing and then... I wanted more. I took it for what it is.. made for TV, history education for young people. The documentary extras were awesome for us people that like history. Made me understand the middle east situation so much better, for example.

I'd say only a new format will spur them to change things.

Time to bring on Holo discs(!)

Yeah, the stuff when he's older is really interesting. The stuff with him as a kid is mildly interesting, but purely as a trip through history. As little as Sean Patrick Flannery was like Harrison Ford, the kid was even more removed from all that.

Totally agreed

The other thing to consider is whether or not 4k really takes off.

Forget 4K... the reason why that is "stupid" is because 8K is way better and the way to go :thumbsup
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

What jlee's talking about, though, is a legitimate point.

To actually get any real benefit out of something like 4K or 8K video, you need a suitably large screen that will actually be able to display all that detail. That means something probably over 50". Right now, 42" and 46" displays are still pretty standard fare, and they're great for 1080p and upscaled 720p. But if you stuck a 4K or 8K feed on to one...it'd be like sticking a 1080p feed onto a 20" screen. Sure, the edges will look a little crisper, but you won't really be able to get the "point" of the blu-ray format.

The implication, therefore, is that manufacturers will have to produce larger sets, with something like 50" becoming the low end of the line. That means (potentially) much higher power consumption, much larger wall spaces needed, etc. That or people use projectors instead of TV sets. But either way, you're talking really big displays.

My point about the consumer electronics industry, however, was that they will figure out ways to do things like take existing panel sizes and somehow increase the resolution on the sets themselves (think of something like what the iPhone 5 did with the retina display -- similar size to the earlier iPhones, but clearer resolution due to more pixels packed into that space). That and they'll find ways to condition the market to WANT bigger displays. If you went back in time to even the late 90s and said "Do you think anyone other than the super-rich will own plasma displays over 50 inches?" people would just laugh at you. And yet, here we are.

Manufacturers are already starting to make some 4K displays. It may not be worthwhile to most people just yet, but they'll make 'em all the same, and eventually that'll become the next standard.


The other thing that I think could change the game is how content delivery is handled. If there's a move away from user-owned home media (e.g. discs or other storage devices that the user owns) and a shift towards streaming, that'll slow the development of higher res content, simply because of bandwidth issues.

But I still think we'll see another version of the films in the next 10-ish years. Possibly sooner, but we shall see.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

It's not just about screen size - it's about proximity to the screen. The pixel density on my iPhone is much higher than on my 60' TV, and rightfully so. If I get arm's length from the TV, the pixels (and especially the compression, which is another conversation) are quite discernable. There are charts you can find pretty easily which mark the viewing distance at which the human eye can't tell the difference between 480/720/1080.

A 4K scan of Star Wars would be very useful for a theatrical re-release with digital projection - it'd make a difference there for sure. It'd make a difference in most home theaters utilizing projectors as well, should people be willing to upgrade.
 
Re: Star Wars Episode VII

Good point.

All that said, I expect that the industry will find ways to convince people to shell out cash for the latest and greatest. Although I think another significant resolution jump will take a little while to really hit.
 
Back
Top