TJSonOfAnder
Member
First, I'm glad to see that 3D-printing is getting more attention on the forum than it was 1-2 years ago. And I DO think that affordable hobbyist 3D-printing is getting better all the time.I could see us doing this at some point in the future, but as Rylo pointed out, we have never focused on HOW a prop/costume is created, but on the type of item.
In the most basic terms, the site is broken into 3 major categories; props, costumes and models and within those categories, it is further divided. The Sculpting forum is the closest we have ever come to focusing on a particular aspect of how something is created. Just don't see it happening yet with 3D printing, although I am in complete agreement that 3D printing is the future of our hobby.
I initially multi-quoted several users and realized that I shouldn't beat that horse and left Art's as it leads up to my thought well. We already have tags to group threads based on the subject of the prop; what if we just added tags for the medium being used? I mean I don't want to go tag crazy, but if I wanted to just see props (or questions) that were 3D-printing related (or CNC related, etc.) then all I'd have to do is search for the tag.
Also I think it would be awesome if there were an attribute in a members profile where they could list resources. i.e. I have a 3D-printer, a lathe, a vacuum form, etc. I don't actually have all of those things but... I know that it has the potential to leave a lot of older members (with more resources) open to pestering from members with fewer resources, but if that is your concern, don't list the tools you don't want to; or list a price per hour in your comments or about section. This would allow members to collaborate more IMO as you could search for member near you with resources you could share/trade/pay-for. Just a thought. Also I started a thread for people to list what 3D-printers if anyone is open to the idea of owning up to having a 3D-printer in a thread that would be a little more searchable as a resource.
It might go without saying at this point, but I also second (or 1.2.3.. fourth?) the motion to have a 3D file/printing area similar to the paper section.