Jeez, that is a lot. Well, look at it this way, with that many Star Wars flicks coming out, we're bound to get some awesome ones, right?
...right??? :confused
You did see what Disney did to The Land Before Time... right?
Not quite the same stature of franchise though. :lol
A lot of "direct to video" releases there!
That was the attempt to bridge the old with the new to bring some familiarity to the story for those of us who grew up with the OT, and it STILL didn't really feel like Star Wars even with the familiar characters. I'd imagine for the majority, it would be ten times worse with NO familiar characters in a universe that's "supposed" to be Star Wars. I wouldn't be one of them as I'd welcome some completely clean slates, and most likely would many of those who grew up with the prequels. Then again, they may have the same syndrome with the prequels as we've had with the OT... At any rate, I think those who want that completely clean slate are far fewer than those who wouldn't and that's probably what those at Lucasfilm/Disney are thinking as well.
I really think people need to stop comparing how Disney will be handling their STAR WARS properties the same way they have these other releases. It's not an apt comparison.
you think all of these Star Wars films will be theatrical?
Just like Kronks New Groove.... Peter Pan 2.... Bambi 2 ....Mulan 2 ...The Lion King 1 1/2... The Little Mermaid, Arial's beginning....
my money says you'll get 7, 8 and 9 in theaters, and ton of sub par crap put direct to DVD
see this list:
List of Disney home entertainment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for what to expect
I really think people need to stop comparing how Disney will be handling their STAR WARS properties the same way they have these other releases. It's not an apt comparison.
considering Harrison Ford is pushing 70, and Boba Fett is dead... exactly how do you think they'd do that film without it being animated? And what chance do you think that has of being a theatrical release?
See, I get that, but I think that's more a product of lack of vision. People can't think beyond what they already know, they know the feeling they want to recapture, and so they just go back to the well assuming it hasn't yet run dry.
Yet when others have stepped outside that to introduce new characters, they've generally been well received. Kyle Katarn and the Dark Forces/Jedi Knight games were popular. The KOTOR games and comics were pretty popular too.
Studios are simply so risk-averse that they'd rather just do what the average chucklebuck can think up in 2 minutes on the can than try to create something new that said chucklebuck would never have dreamed of.
I'm not saying that Young Han Solo and Boba Fett movies won't be fun, but it's just another example of BRANDING based on timidity.
As mentioned in the article, this time however they might go with Han Solo in his 20s, instead of being a kid.
See Lucasfilm's Concept Art of Young Han Solo | /Film
As mentioned in the article, this time however they might go with Han Solo in his 20s, instead of being a kid.
I'm really, really glad that ended up getting cut.
Those characters you would do more prequels. The time before Star Wars. With different actors.
I'm not saying that Young Han Solo and Boba Fett movies won't be fun, but it's just another example of BRANDING based on timidity.