Proof for "The Dollar Trilogy" being a real trilogy?

MadMike

Well-Known Member
Hey boys and girls,
I am currently writing my Bachelor-Thesis about similarities between an medieval novel (where Parzival, one of Arthur's knights, tries to find the Holy Grail) and the Dollar Trilogy with focus on Clint Eastwood's character throughout the three movies.

My question to all of you out there is this: is there any real "proof" that "A Fistful of Dollars", "For a Few Dollars More" and "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" are really a triology?
I mean of course, you can look at the characters, how they behave, what they are wearing and so on and say "yeah, that is the first part, that is the second part, etc", but...do you know what I mean? Perhaps an interview with Sergio Leone or Eastwood in which he says "yeah, these three movies form a trilogy"?

There are some websites on which you can find this information (for example Wikipedia with an own article on the Trilogy), but I guess I need something more...quotable, as it will appear in an academic paper (and Wikipedia never looks good in these :D )

Thank you in advance, and...oh, yeah. I wasn't really sure on where to put this, here in Entertainment and Movie Talk or better in Off-Topic. If putting it here was the wrong decision, please feel free to move.
 

aeonpulse

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER

augofett

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
Well, as far as I´ve learned (including the comentaries on the bluray) the movies were not concieved as a trilogy. The "Man With No Name" was a publicity slogan made for the USA release. Clint Eastwood´s character is called Joe, Manco/Monco, and Blondie, not meaning to be the same person.
 

Solo4114

Master Member
They're loosely connected. At the end of The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, Blondie picks up the outfit he'll end up wearing for the rest of the "Dollars" trilogy. It's what he wears in A Fistfull of Dollars, and then again in For a Few Dollars More, where he modifies the outfit somewhat by adding a cobra to the butt of his gun, and wearing a leather bracer on his wrist. Outside of that, though, there's no explicit connection between the characters. The Mariachi trilogy has a tighter connection between characters, even though they changed actors after the first film.
 

dbuck

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
It can get even better. Initially Leone wanted Clint back for Once Upon A Time In The West, but Clint decided against it. Then he asked if Clint, Van Cleef, and Wallach would be the characters Bronson kills at the beginning of the movie at the train station but that didn't go over too well.

I don't have a problem with them as a trilogy. No one really knows his name, and/or he uses aliases, and once put into chronological order his money has a bad tendency to slip through his fingers. He works cheaper later on, if you think about it.
Notice that he did not have a Confederate Soldier's name when in the prison camp. Wallach was Bill Carson, but they never showed Clint responding to a name, just to stay with the program established in the other (and later chronologically) movies.
 

Mola Rob

Sr Member
I have never felt they were anything more than three standalone movies but I suppose they could be considered a trilogy. I don't think there is any evidence to the contrary just as there is no hard evidence that they are connected.
 

Solo4114

Master Member
They're more of a thematic or stylistic trilogy than a true story arc or even a story about necessarily THE same character.
 

simiouno

Active Member
They're loosely connected. At the end of The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, Blondie picks up the outfit he'll end up wearing for the rest of the "Dollars" trilogy. It's what he wears in A Fistfull of Dollars, and then again in For a Few Dollars More, where he modifies the outfit somewhat by adding a cobra to the butt of his gun, and wearing a leather bracer on his wrist. Outside of that, though, there's no explicit connection between the characters. The Mariachi trilogy has a tighter connection between characters, even though they changed actors after the first film.
He has Rattlesnake grips in all three movies..his gun in G B & U is a civil war era 51 Navy but cartridge converted ..he only has hand brace after fist full, when the bad guys smash his hand .. in few dollars more he has it at the start and only uses his right for shooting, so in crono order - Gun grips ,gets poncho 1860s gets hand smashed 1870s teams up with Mortimer still 70s but later with damaged hand .. I'll admit that at the end of G B & U he splits 200 grand with Tuco , so by the time of fist full he's only got a Mule ..he sure goes through the money..could have a bad gambling problem who knows..but definitely a trilogy ! !
 
Top