Pixels (Post-release)

Jeyl

Master Member
Re: Pixels (trailer)

Found this in the trailer. Don't worry. It's a legit site.

Screen Shot 2015-03-17 at 9.19.06 PM.png
 

0neiros

Master Member
Re: Pixels (trailer)

Wow, I'm actually interested in an Adam Sandler movie. Could be worse, could be Eddie Murphy, with Eddie Murphy as Pac-Man, Dig Dug, Donkey Kong, Frogger etc etc etc.
 

Jeyl

Master Member
Absoluteley hilarious review (nsfw) https://youtu.be/BFD2293oGvA

*watches video*
He puts Pixels on the same train as the Transformers movies? What could possibly match "Enemy Scrotum"?

Qno_zpssf27b5pg.png


....Can it get worse?

So Pixels ends with the only likable character (Q*bert) and the only non-bulls*** incarnation of it's own premise blinking out of existence so that one of two vaguely prominient women characters in the entire cast can serve as a literal trophy.

Yes. Yes it can. Congratulations Pixels. Not since X-Men Days of Future's Past have I avoided a film due to it's handling of female characters. At least X-Men has the benefit of being liked compared to you.
 

Wes R

Legendary Member
If it had a better cast I think this movie would do good, especially among gamers but having Sandler's name attached to anything is box office poison. It's a shame as I really like seeing some of the old game characters updated in cgi. Guess we have to hope for a Wreck It Ralph 2 for them to get proper treatment.
 

CPTRogers

Sr Member
Just saw it with my 6 year old son. Was a fun movie. Im not sure what all the bashing is about. I thought the CGI was pretty damn good. The movie seemed a little rushed over all but it was darn funny at times.
 
This thread is more than 6 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
Top