RKW
Sr Member
<div class='quotetop'>(Cyberman @ Oct 21 2006, 07:59 PM) [snapback]1342333[/snapback]</div>
If that bit of information is true... How come the above points I made are not more accurate... The proportions are wrong... The character is lost???
[/b][/quote]
Well I'm not sure I agree with all your points on the VC. But this is perhaps why we should take the information that half of it came from an original with a pinch of salt. I don't know where that information came from. Hopefully by the end of November I'll have the two in hand to compare side by side
That or we could just ask Neill if he was involved at all in the VC production.
<div class='quotetop'>(RKW @ Oct 21 2006, 06:44 PM) [snapback]1342314[/snapback]
I think SPDOmegaranger is refering to the lack of a sheen rather than specific details. As I understood it the voice changer was created from half an original and then mirrored. They then went on to modify other areas such as the forehead.
[/b]
If that bit of information is true... How come the above points I made are not more accurate... The proportions are wrong... The character is lost???
[/b][/quote]
Well I'm not sure I agree with all your points on the VC. But this is perhaps why we should take the information that half of it came from an original with a pinch of salt. I don't know where that information came from. Hopefully by the end of November I'll have the two in hand to compare side by side
That or we could just ask Neill if he was involved at all in the VC production.