chubsANDdoggers

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
I can't place the scope... have you started making your own, Chubs?

Yes and no. I mean I’ve always been making my own scopes [emoji106]

Mine are just not metal..
104925d4d268f80f55b5fbbb862a8444.jpg


But that scope in my previous post is actually Field Marshals..
 
Last edited:

Marcos22579

New Member
I found this poster at a local store.
The blaster has no numbers on the gun sight. The screws on the scope base are allen as in the TFA blaster and the handle doesn't have the amount mount of liines as in the TFA or ANH . The scope has no internal theads and the right side is the same as in the Masters Replica built.

The gas cylinder is silver metal and the droid caller and square greeblie (battery pack for blaster) looks like casts plastic.

Any thoughts on these finds?
b50e62f3f7866878e0b44c6951b03bef.jpg
be57c8ccd2f731bf896cd2653723035e.jpg
57dbcc98d0bc9393f8ea00ec5d04ab9a.jpg



Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
32337c7dfa3bf5e010a4b5257be18186.jpg
 
Last edited:

chubsANDdoggers

Sr Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
I found this poster at a local store.
The blaster has no numbers on the gun sight. The screws on the scope base are allen as in the TFA blaster and the handle doesn't have the amount mount of liines as in the TFA or ANH . The scope has no internal theads and the right side is the same as in the Masters Replica built.

The gas cylinder is silver metal and the droid caller and square greeblie (battery pack for blaster) looks like casts plastic.

Any thoughts on these finds?https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180428/b50e62f3f7866878e0b44c6951b03bef.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180428/be57c8ccd2f731bf896cd2653723035e.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180428/57dbcc98d0bc9393f8ea00ec5d04ab9a.jpg


Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180428/32337c7dfa3bf5e010a4b5257be18186.jpg

This is a great find! Thank you for sharing! When u mention the right side did u take any pictures? I’d love to see the mount. Still haven’t seen any good shots of that side just yet.

When u say no numbers on the sight are u referring to the scope wheel?
2a99a5aff9fe718b06bb1e0a6e10a8ce.jpg
 

Marcos22579

New Member
The scope wheel is brass on top black on the sides with 1-10 numbers. The gun sight leaf has no numbers like on the Masters Replica.
What I meant for right side was the fix plate. Similar to the TFA airsoft fix. There is even a blotch that looks like a bad sand job on the fire selector hole.
The handle has 11 to 12 lines or grooves instead of the correct amount as on the ANH built.
The trigger safety is the same as the TFA, with a thru hole.

Finally there are the screws that look like allen key and the rear sight that has no threads.

The pictures are not the best. The store had an overhead light that made a lot of reflection on the banner plastic. But the gun was oversized and the details I am pointing out were visible at plain sight.
841a31cadcf82e401009a5130ceecc7b.jpg
f92bcee9ba691fd412f4a728b309b42e.jpg


Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 

Halliwax

Legendary Member
RPF PREMIUM MEMBER
You would think they would just use anovos stuff wouldn’t that make sense?

Already made, pretty accurate...

I wonder why thy result to making things from scratch still


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Marcos22579

New Member
You would think they would just use anovos stuff wouldn’t that make sense?

Already made, pretty accurate...

I wonder why thy result to making things from scratch still


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I havn't seen an anovos DL-44 blaster but the belt holster and greeblies look a lot like the stuff they make.
I am very pissed with the Blaster changes from TFA and now I am starting to hate this Solo Movie "new blaster" even before the movie is on cinemas.


Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
Top