, the stunts weren’t meant for close ups so them being thrown around on set wasn’t a big deal
I thought this was meant to be a stunt converted & spruced up
Specifically for a close up shot where all those dings & things ( not to menton grub screws) would show up if not addressed. Leaving as turned on the lathe would probably do (or rather did). I tidied my example as i used extruded tube & wanted the machine marks radial not longitudinal.
The shots from the exhibition look like it's in pretty good nick considering but I differ to someone who's seen it close up.
I would take all your comments without salt if it weren't for the fact that the marks I'm pointing at weren't 1) all circular & 2) in exactly the same locations we see grub screws on other stunt sabers & that's far too coincidental for me not pay it close scrutiny.
It wouldn't take long to put in the aluminium plugs needed hide the holes/grub screws (for the close up) & these can also be left as machined as I could have done.
Perhaps some one with a 3d cad wire frame could map the position & overlay on the various photo's to check they're remaining put ? or compare to, say, the V3?
One down side to this hobby is the placebo effect, once I see it everyone sees it.
That's true (but not a placebo effect more autosuggestion but I know what you mean) - it's also true, particularly amongst theorists, that when faced with the choice of changing ones mind or proving you don't have to that most people set about the proof.
As for the mark under the emitter face, kinda looks like a simple milling mark, and the machinist changed his/her mind and moved the hole to the nipple inside of the v2 location
Could be. That dimple has me foxed but it's not the scenario you outline - you don't drill holes with an end mill.
I've teased another view of one out here.