Actually I think Jaun Giminez did the design that they flat ripped off, in a series from 1989 called The Fourth Quarter
They used Papyrus as the font for everything. It's like looking at a flyer for Taco Day at the Office in 1991.
Unfortunately a lot of critisms presented can be applied to the majority of films that have been released within the last 20-30 years.
Star Wars is heavily influenced by The Hidden Fortress; but like Avatar, it's a similar story but again featured in space *yawn* (the sad thing is that most westerners won't have seen The Hidden Fortress, or worse even heard of it), so nothing original there. It has the same old tried and tested characters...the main villain all dressed in black, the wizard mentor etc etc...again something we've all seen before...and thats only the tip of the iceberg; and that was back in 1977.
Avatar cartoony? Stylised more like, surely it's better than muppets in space.
So most criticisms that you direct at Avatar are easily applicable to other films which aren't so cool to hate. I know everyone's entitled to their own opinions, thats fine. But I thought it was interesting to note that certain titles are looked at with rose tinted glasses, even though they are entirely flawed in the same way.
So yeah, the bottom line is...Star Wars is THE HIDDEN FORTRESS...in SPACE!
I always thought the heli's looked a lot like the Orca's from Command and Conquer.
![]()
and the Scorpion for reference
![]()
I guess that makes me the last one on the planet that hasn't seen it, nor do I intend to.
Just goggle 'tilt rotor' or 'osprey'. It's an old idea. I first saw it in the UFO tv show.
And it's kind of like the drop ship from Aliens, which Cameron kind of remade. Even has Ripley.
![]()
Unfortunately a lot of critisms presented can be applied to the majority of films that have been released within the last 20-30 years.
Avatar cartoony? Stylised more like, surely it's better than muppets in space.
But Avatar gets special hate because it was touted as being some kind of giant breakthrough. Some great leap for mankind was implied with words like 'gamechanging.' The media hype was way bigger than for any film in over a decade. Seems to me that visually the film was just the same old same old (LotR, Starship Troopers, Prequels) plus 3D gimmick.
Cartoony, yes. Sub Jurassic Park depiction of reality. Cartoony in the perpetually 'floating', 'swelling' forms of the characters as seen in classic Disney animation. That look is fine for cel animation but I thought cg was supposed to be going for a realistic look. Stop motion looks more realistic in some ways, something I thought I'd never say about 21st Century cgi back in 1993. The most perfect cgi was the T Rex in JP. It's been downhill from there, with the 'gamechanging' Avatar doing nothing much to halt the decline.
Saw it a the cinema and thought it was fantastic! Yes, VERY derivative and, essentially, annoying if you stop to think about it. Which i did....many months passed after the cinema visit and, due to threads discussing and mainly hating the movie, i too began to despise and deride.....
6 weeks ago, i watched it with the Mrs. in 3d on our big telly with oomphing sound...and i really enjoyed it!
I'm actually not sure what my point is:$, probably something in the vein of "...Anger leads to hate....hate leads to..." cobblers, BUT....we could probably sit in front of most flicks cynically going, " cohhh...yeah, right, as if that could happen....ridiculous....etc......"
So....ummm.....so there, that's that.:lol
Rich
Ahh Sigma that was awesome. I can sleep happily now :lol