MooCriket
Master Member
Ha! I remember that! That was the juvenile Rex. Good times. I think I played with that one more than any of the others...even the Bull Rex. I also loved the Raptor hand puppet.
Jurassic World
- Thread starter Lutso
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jurassic park
Ha! I remember that! That was the juvenile Rex. Good times. I think I played with that one more than any of the others...even the Bull Rex. I also loved the Raptor hand puppet.
seelsa73
Sr Member
Yea I had one of them and loved it!
ambulanceartist
Active Member
Jurassicworld.com updated its Dino list today. So for the first time we get to see Dinos that we've only read about or have seen labeled in vials in the past movies. How many we actually see in the film is a different story, but it's great to see what these creatures finally look like in the Jurassic Park universe.
Instead of going with John Williams' amazing themes and what have you they have gone for some generic sounding crap for Jurassic World:
:facepalm the hell
:facepalm the hell
Last edited by a moderator:
ambulanceartist
Active Member
pretty sure this was just place holder music for the first trailer. I remember reading somewhere the score hadn't even been worked on at the time this trailer was released back in November.
That would be awesome to hear.
Michael Giacchino is doing the score for Jurassic World and will be "Incorporating John William's themes".
TheDodgeMan
Well-Known Member
It's going the a letdown
We have now seen a grand total of about three minutes out of a two-hour (ish) movie. How about reserving judgement until we see more/the whole film?
And before anyone points it out, I'm not being a hypocrite on the basis of my stance on the new Ghostbusters -- that entire project is flawed from inception by being an unnecessary reboot (and even then, I'm still willing to give it a chance...maybe).
--Jonah
And before anyone points it out, I'm not being a hypocrite on the basis of my stance on the new Ghostbusters -- that entire project is flawed from inception by being an unnecessary reboot (and even then, I'm still willing to give it a chance...maybe).
--Jonah
DuneMuadDib
Sr Member
What's the point of movie trailers if not to judge whether the film is worth our time and money?
Riceball
Master Member
True, but I'd argue that it's one thing to say that based on the trailer(s) a given movie doesn't look appealing to you and another to say that based on the trailer(s) it's going to suck.
DuneMuadDib
Sr Member
True, but many people express the former by saying the latter.
Exactly....AND trailers are suppose to entice viewers to see the movie based on an intriguing plot, characters and visuals....so far none of these are intriguing in the least bit.
*nods* I see where' y'all are coming from. Having read the first two books, I can point to a lot of things I liked better in those than the films, and vice versa. I can point to things I liked in each of the three films, and things that I didn't -- from minor niggle to downright "OH, COME ON!"... And I guess that's the standpoint from which I'm approaching this film. I don't really need the trailer to know I'm going to see it. I'm pretty sure I'll like parts of it and not like parts of it, and I'm curious to see what that eventual distribution ends up being. I'm not expecting greatness. I'm expecting a fun movie that isn't as execrably bad as Bayformers, and preferably at least a couple notches better than JJ-Trek.
--Jonah
--Jonah
Similar threads
