Iron Man 2 Movie Arc Reactor Prop Replica Licensed

[Jedifyfe]

Hmmm. It looks promissing!...

Based on the movie prop from the blockbuster Iron Man 2, using reference from Stan Winston Studios, this is the latest iteration of Tony Stark's "heart," the Arc Reactor. The device supplies energy to an electromagnet, which prevents embedded shrapnel from reaching Tony Stark's heart. No expense was spared to replicate the details exactly, from the machined metal parts and copper wire to the high intensity LEDs. The Arc Reactor measures 4 1/2" x 4 1/2" and is made from machined aluminum, stainless steel, custom molded plastic, Removeable from the stand, the prop includes a plexiglass display case and a full-color Certificate of Authenticity.

 

[Bowelrock]

Oh boy! Doesn't look like its gonna be cheap.

 

[MooMooEgg]

What company is making it? The licensed one from IM1 wasn't very accurate at all.

 

[Prince NEO]

I don't like it, the $10 toy looks more detailed to me,

I did like the IM 1 reactor though.

 

[micdavis]

The base is more complex than the RT.

 

[Prince NEO]

agreed, I think they are just trying to make a quick buck with this one honestly.

 

[MooMooEgg]

ugh. popped in the bluray just now and took a look at the quick sceond when this is on the screen. There is NO cover over the actual reactor.

And I agree... the stand looks more detailed than the reactor, but maybe the innards are more detailed. :thumbsdown

Sorry for the cell phone pic.

 

[Prince NEO]

I think the cover was so they could attempt to skimp out on the inner details, though I don't think that it has many

 

[NakedMoleRat]

Nawwwwwwwwwww!

The Mark 1 was such a beautiful thing.

This just looks....."Less"......somehow.

 

[Kylash]

hardly as interesting as the original..

 

[GuntahKela]

They are going for $150.00 on Ebay, pre-sales, of course.

 

[Xris]

Mark 1 is awesome...this however look like a cheap toy IMO. If it looked more like the screen used I would have definitely bought it.

 

[cayman shen]

The base is more complex than the RT.

That was my first thought...it distracts from the piece, and also upstages it. The stand looks better than what it's displaying! But if it was in the movie, I guess they gotta do that.

 

[darthwhitey]

I can see how real IM fans will love this, but the arc from the first film had so much more character...this one seems too futuristic or something..

Of course just my 2 cents

brad

 

[MooMooEgg]

I demand the deleted scene where Tony is carefully crafting the stand and drinking his chlorophyll drink while waiting for the reactor diagnostics from JARVIS.

 

[GuntahKela]

I can see how real IM fans will love this, but the arc from the first film had so much more character...this one seems too futuristic or something..

Of course just my 2 cents

brad

I consider myself a huge Iron man fan, but I would only buy this reactor if the final product is better than the publicity pic and/or if the price comes down, drastically.

 

[Prince NEO]

I consider myself a huge Iron man fan, but I would only buy this reactor if the final product is better than the publicity pic and/or if the price comes down, drastically.

I second this opinion

 

[MooCriket]

I demand the deleted scene where Tony is carefully crafting the stand and drinking his chlorophyll drink while waiting for the reactor diagnostics from JARVIS.

Ditto, I would also love to see that. As for this..meh, just does not seem to have the same "charm" as the Mark I.

 

[nexnox]

I think the cover was so they could attempt to skimp out on the inner details, though I don't think that it has many

I didn't design the RT, but I did design the stand, and... I designed a whole interior for that RT unit. There was supposed to be a montage of it's assembly. Looks like they burned that trick on whiplash's. I imagine I could show the interior that was never shown.. I will have to see.

 

[Prince NEO]

/\That would be cool