Ghost in the Shell - "Cutter's Geisha"

Supe

Member
Merry Christmas, everyone!

Have a question for the forum - has anyone ever seen any other source material for "Cutter's Geisha" other than the Prop Store Auction? It was a beautifully created Weta Workshop mask and linen kimono combination that never made the final cut of Ghost in the Shell (and also unique in the sense that it appears to be the only geisha from the film that was not intended to have hair). I am particularly interested in details pertaining to the intended lighting/electronics for the costume, as well as the shape/construction of the obi/sash, since the "bow" appears to be a very unique shape/construction. If anyone has any leads, it would be very much appreciated. Link to the auction pages below:


img02med.jpg

img01med.jpg
 
On yeggi or thingverse someone posted a pretty good 3d file. It is a free file, but well done
 

Attachments

  • 20201225_201637.jpg
    20201225_201637.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 173
I think Adam Savage had a tour of the workshop and focused heavily on this in one of his tested videos.
You’re absolutely right, but they did not feature this particular geisha, but had all of the ones that made the opening scene from the film.

On yeggi or thingverse someone posted a pretty good 3d file. It is a free file, but well done
I’ve actually got a slightly scaled down version of that one printed out right now. If I try a Cutter’s Geisha replica, I will likely use the same one with a set of printed ears and worbla for the remainder, as all of the other models have the hair molded.
 
I wonder if asavage happened to see this one kicking around during any of his Weta Workshop visits? I did send an inquiry off to Weta, though I'm not holding my breath on a response.
 
I've reached out to a forum member to see about modeling the complete hairless head, and have been trying to find a source for a similar looking fabric. Easier said than done! The angles of the obi itself also look like they'll be a bear to try and recreate.
 
This thread is more than 3 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. This thread hasn't been active in some time. A new post in this thread might not contribute constructively to this discussion after so long.
If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top