It's a terrible B drive-in flik. It looks cheap, the characters are ridiculous, and the acting stinks. The only good thing in it is the car.
Sorry, that's way too dismissive for this film. Road Warrior was clearly the far better film, but Mad Max was still an amazing film for 1979. It's a visceral revenge film on a slow burn. When it gets going, it really goes. It is a low-budg film, and that is evident. But what they did was fabulous. Max had more dimension here than in any of the sequels. This film made Mel Gibson a star. Sure, he's fallen in recent years, but, no Mad Mad, very likely no Lethal Weapon. The kinetic action sequences were amazing for the time. It's a mistake to view past films through the lens of today. As has been said, they need to be viewed through the window of history. I remember watching Max with my buddies on cable in the early 80s. It was awesome to all of us.
Yeah, I'm more in line with this view. Of course it's a B-movie with no budget. That's the point. It's like El Mariachi in that respect. They did amazing stuff with a very limited budget. If you go in expecting a huge extravaganza, you're gonna be disappointed. But for what it is -- which, again, I concede is a B-movie -- it's really, really good.
That said, if that style of film isn't your thing, I can understand not liking it. I can also understand modern audiences finding it hard to connect with, especially in comparison to its sequels. It has a very, very different "vibe" to it.
Despite all of the fan love for Mad Max, I agree with you (though I'm not so sure about the car). After a friend recommended it back in 1979, my wife and I went to see it (she was my girlfriend at the time). After 30 minutes we decided doing anything else would be better than watching the rest of the movie. Years later I did give it a second chance and watched it from start to finish, and my opinion didn't change.
That being said, there have been quite a few popular movies over the years that I didn't care for, but I could understand why other people liked them. With Mad Max, I have absolutely no idea why anyone thinks it's a good movie; it's sincerely one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
Then you must not have seen too many bad movies. Seriously, man, there are WAY worse films out there. Anything affiliated with the name "Uwe Boll," for example, most of Michael Bay's oeuvre, almost any movie that ever appeared on MST3K, etc., etc., etc.
I dunno. I can understand not
enjoying the film, or finding it dull, or just not finding that style of film to be particularly engaging. But for what it is, for the budget they had, it's actually pretty well made. Try watching, say, the original Gone in 60 Seconds, which has WAY worse acting, and is (in my opinion) far less engaging story-wise, and constructed in a far more haphazard way. Its stuntwork is top-notch, but otherwise, it's really not a very well made film.
I think a lot of people first saw The Road Warrior but were disappointed when they later watched Mad Max expecting a similar movie.
The first two films are really action-car chase movies in an apocalyptic sci-fi setting with Mad Max much closer to the car chase genre and The Road Warrior much closer to the apocalyptic sci-fi genre.
Mad Max as a chase movie in the vein of Vanishing Point or Bullitt is a superb movie.
I see it as a mix of two genres, actually. It mixes the "rogue cop/revenge thriller" genre (e.g. Dirty Harry, Death Wish) with the "road movie/car chase movie" genre.
In terms of its pacing and such, I do find it similar to films like Vanishing Point or Dirty Mary Crazy Larry. Although, those two films involve some existentialist aspects in the background, which is less addressed in Mad Max. I find Bullit to be...more of a "proto" car-chase film. The story isn't built around the chase, but the chase features prominently. Kinda like The French Connection. By contrast, Vanishing Point and Gone in 60 Seconds are DEFINITELY about the chase.
Anyway, if you watch films in the "car chase" genre, most of them are shot this way, most were low-budget, and not all were of the same quality. Some are better than others, some are just pure exploitation flicks. I think the original Mad Max is one of the better entries into that genre, but I can also understand why it's not everyone's cup of tea.
The Road Warrior, on the other hand, is just so damn visually engaging that I don't get how someone would dislike it. The only way that'd make sense is if they've literally never seen it, and are only now coming to it after watching all the
other movies that have evolved from it. Like, someone watching, say, the original Star Wars and finding it dull with cheesy f/x, without understanding its role in cinema.