Wait wait wait....you honestly expect someone to ADMIT being a recaster? A guy, who after selling his wares to people and claiming his sculpting prowess, may have duped you all into thinking you were buying anything BUT recast goods and you expect him to out HIMSELF?
Wow...
EXACTLY
Only a confession.
Which means you were never open to any evidence presented regardless of what it was.
And do you seriously think he would admit to the recasting???!
.
As Gino pointed out it already happened with other recasters.
Even Bill Clinton admitted he lied about the Lewinski matter.
and aa still insist he sculpted the original helmet with an angle grinderlol:lol
some people are man enough to owe up, others aren't...
And AA still insist he sculpted the original helmet with an angle grinderlol:lol
Some people are man enough to owe up, others aren't...
Behave will you nobody needs an English lesson from people that bastardised the English language![]()
:lol I agree, actually in England and in English we do actually use" beyond reasonable doubt" American law and terminology is very different. We also use the old English language when applicable as we invented it and are allowed to!:lol
Thou wouldst be mistaken, forsooth!
DON'T get me started on linguistic butchery! BOTH ths U.K.,and the U.S. are guilty of horrible mispronunciations,mis-spellings,syntax(grammer usage)slang,and coloquialisms! But,THAT is another topic for another thread,entirely,as this is an off topic subject in this thread,and all comments like this may be removed from this thread,if the moderators deem it to be necessary! Back to the topic please!:rolleyes
DON'T get me started on linguistic butchery! BOTH ths U.K.,and the U.S. are guilty of horrible mispronunciations,mis-spellings,syntax(grammer usage)slang,and coloquialisms! But,THAT is another topic for another thread,entirely,as this is an off topic subject in this thread,and all comments like this may be removed from this thread,if the moderators deem it to be necessary! Back to the topic please!:rolleyes
Can I just remind you that this was my topic and you have all gone vastly off topic!!!!!
Can I just remind you that this was my topic and you have all gone vastly off topic!!!!!
Hell, it's all fun and games NOW. Your question was answered on the first page.![]()
No I say all things equal I feel the evidence towards recasting is heavier then that against...
And I have yet to see anything of substance put forward to suggest an original sculpt... Nothing... Everything put forward thus far trying to claim original can easily weigh on the side of chances made to hide origins... I see nothing to teeter it in either direction they simply even out the scale...
The bump on the other hand as small as it is to me is the most damning for recast, the chance of coincidence is beyond what I would consider likely in the real world... This as small as it is for me teeters the scale towards the recast side...