Building The Death Star - PRODUCTION

Sounds good on the pencil. I had forgotten over the years about the varying lead hardness (been a while since I've taken a fill-in-the-bubble; No. 2 pencil test!). On the model, it looks strongly as if they used both lead, and ink - the jet black lines were likely a very fine-tipped marker.

could also be that they used variable lead hardnesses

some soft leads are pitch black, and the harder ones look a bit more silvery
 
This is crazy - take a close look at this shot.

Realize how large that screw is (easily two times life size). Then look at those fine strips of speckle-pattern. And now imagine you're masking off that thin of a strip, and painting it with what is possibly a multistage paint job. Anything is possible, but man, I wonder how they did this...

052809009.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trip to Seattle: Mission accomplished; sort of...

I ended up with 10 or 11 shots before the got huffy with me.

Clowns!

Sorry you couldn't get better access. As I PM'ed you, I had higher hopes. Still, you're doing such an amazing job with what you have already, this project is already one of the best I've ever witnessed.

Can't wait to catch up and see where you are today :^)
 
after that last post... yes definitely marker

all I can say is... you sir, have a lot of taping to do!
can't wait for the next update!
 
Rob, did you notice the scribed longitudinal lines in that pic too? 2 of them go under the screw, and there's one on the right side. That'd drive me nuts trying to scribe those...
 
Rob, did you notice the scribed longitudinal lines in that pic too? 2 of them go under the screw, and there's one on the right side.

I'm not entirely sure they are scribed, at least how we're using the term.

See the similar line in this pic? If you follow this line all the way to the left where the painted surface ends, there is solid light coming out of this seam in a thin horizantal line; extends for four or five inches from the unfinished clear acrylic into the painted area.
0528090015.jpg


I refer to it back here:
--It appears they used some form of applique, laminate or other type of suface-applied layered material; on the far left (facing the dish) where the painting stops and the clear acrylic starts, there are horizontal thin lines of light eminating from where the layers don't quite meet properly (think latitude lines), and there is scoring along the length of the latitude lines

I suppose it is possible they scored the painted surface, and scored too deeply in that area, but my gut feeling is that it is a seam where two layers of ??? were applied, and the line of light on the far left is where the layers do not meet perfectly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is crazy - take a close look at this shot.
Realize how large that screw is (easily two times life size). Then look at those fine strips of speckle-pattern. And now imagine you're masking off that thin of a strip, and painting it with what is possibly a multistage paint job. Anything is possible, but man, I wonder how they did this...

Say Rob...

Any chance you're thinking about this backwards? If the speckle-pattern was put down first, then thin chartpack tape could easily be used to mask these thin strips before over spraying the grey.

Does the speckle actually have much of a physical texture? Any evidence of it under the solid grey area(s)?

Just a thought!

Marcus
 
I have actually considered that. Truth be told, in person there is really no clear indication one way or the other. I looked, but couldn't see anything. In other words, there is no physical relief between the speckled areas and the soid grey areas.

The only relief noticeable is what I've mentioned a few times as we've come along - above and below the blank equatorial band, the scoring pictured, and at the vertical edge of the painted portion.
 
This pic sort of exemplifies that - you can see the edge on the blank band, and the scoring depression along the latitude, but there is no real sign of physical relief between the grey and the speckle.

052809003.jpg
 
Last edited:
Clowns!

Sorry you couldn't get better access. As I PM'ed you, I had higher hopes. Still, you're doing such an amazing job with what you have already, this project is already one of the best I've ever witnessed.

Can't wait to catch up and see where you are today :^)


Well perhaps someday the original will "change venue", if you catch my drift, and we can make some form of a connection. ;)

Not too much progress so far this weekend - still working on shortening the trench. If I complete that early enough tomorrow, I hope to do some more detail painting.
 
Last edited:
Do any of the editions of the "Art of Ralph McQuarrie" book have information about how he painted the Death Star?

Speaking of McQuarrie... his 80th birthday is two weeks from today.
 
Holy smokes Rob! :eek:eek:eek This thread has literally everything one needs to know about the ANH Death Star! And how to build it!

Nicely done my friend! :cool:cool:cool

I can't wait to view this beastie finished! (y)love:thumbsup
 
Same pic we've been looking at (by the way, I'm just musing out loud here - I could analyze every square inch of the model like this)...

Look at that small sliver of speckle pattern in the circle. Keep in mind that is thinner than the marker lines adjacent to it.

Goodlord002.jpg


How and why...!?


Good lord...

facepalm.jpg

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look at that small sliver of speckle pattern in the circle. Keep in mind that is thinner than the marker lines adjacent to it. How and why...!?

How? There are two related questions here, both important but maybe very different answers: "How was this done originally?" (A matter of asking the right people and hoping for accurate memories) and "How can you do today this to look like the original results?" Maybe you can do it just like they did it, maybe not.

Why? I used to spend a lot of time watching (okay, pestering) the matte painters at Dream Quest (back in the days that they actually painted with paint!) and it was obvious that they did not plan, in detail, every brush stroke. What looked like meticulous detail on-screen (or even standing a few feet away from the painting) was often a serendipitous smudge or spatter. These guys just had the talent for that. I don't think there is going to be a "Why" answer for a lot of the "detail" that you are studying. Maybe the edge of a strip of masking tape lifts a bit and paint goes where it wasn't intended and there you go, instant detail!? A marking pen runs low on ink and an intended solid line is broken up randomly. Again, instant detail.

This is the point in the project that you have to shift your thinking. You're an artist now, not a craftsman making a mechanical reproduction. And Rob, having seen a lot of your work here on the RPF, I know you are an artist. Don't over think it, just create!!

And have fun!

Marcus
 
If I had to guess, I would say simple overspray. i.e. the masking for that area, whether intentionally or not, was incomplete in that one spot.

If you are convinced that it was a manufactured item used to create the pattern, I would do some research into granite patterned shelf paper from the era. You might find something, or a complete lack, that way.

-Adam
 
Excellent response, Marcus - thanks!

Yes, as I slip deeper into studying and analyzing, I forget the points you bring out. Fine elements like this mostlikely not conscious decisions of the artists. Everything you stated make perfect sense, and I have adhered to that understanding principle in past projects.


Adam, good point. May be worth exploring, even if just to satisfy my curiosity.
 
Couple more tests:

The two on the right you've seen already. The one on the far left is Rust-o-leum grey primer with the same black and white speckling the second in from the left is the same combo but with some silver added.
053109002.jpg


This one is just black and white only
0531090035.jpg
 
Back
Top