The black lines are nerve-wracking. So many of them, which increases the potential to screw up and get thme at incorret angles (veering off from a true line to the pole). It is tedius.
Also... The ink lines are quite stark.
I'm condfident they used ink on the original, and mine look pretty much like they do in the reference. But so far on mine I have just a small area with lines, compared to an overall "clean" sphere, so they stand out quite a lot.
And I'm realizing something...
Regardless how good my reference shots are, I really have no way to tell if the overall look of the lines is in league with how it should be.
This is because all my shots of the original are in a dark room (albeit with flash), shooting through glass, at a model that is scarred and faded.
All my shots of my own model are in a brightly lit workshop, with no interference between the cam and the model, and of a clean, fresh, unfaded model.
So I suppose it makes sense that the lines on mine will "pop" more so on the original.
Hardest thing for me is gauging how dark the pencil lines should be, due to fading. The ink lines on Gus' don't appear to have faded one bit (surprisingly). But the lead lines clearly have, to the point that some have been all but lost to time.
Thoughts?
Commentary?