Re: Who is the best Director. Well, in your mind.
Kubrick got more out of his actors than almost any other director. Sure, he beat it out of 'em, but it worked. And his eye is better than Scott's. Like him or not, every single flick Kubrick made is considered a great. Unlike Scott.
I'll give you the first two, for sure; but, really... the others?
yes really, the others. You're welcome to disagree.
I think Black Hawk Down, Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven are great films.
I'm not a big Thelma and Louise fan, but I sat through it once. If nothing else it was him stretching himself artistically.
I disagree. Kubrick liked simple stark palettes. Scott does light and shadow better, and has a much richer look to his shots.
And let's be honest. Disregarding the hype. Full Metal Jacket, while a great film, Mathew Modine has some pretty wooden moments. Same with Eyes Wide Shut. I get what he was going for, and on the whole it works, but there are some scenes that are just "meh" There are people on this very board that can't sit through 2001. And I find alot of Kubrick's characters aren't very deep.
I'm not saying Kubrick isn't great, but his body of work is much smaller (16 films compared to 28 completed by Scott), and if we're going to start throwing stones, I'll watch Kingdom of Heaven two dozen times before I rewatch Eyes Wide Shut again.
And if you think Scott wishes he was Kubrick, then I'll just respond that Kubrick WISHES he was Kurasowa. But then, a ton of directors wish they were Kurasowa.
I'm sure there are plenty of folks here who would whine if someone said Francis Ford Coppola... and then cite Godfather 3. And I'm sure someone will shriek Speilburg, and Lucas.
So you're welcome to dogpile on my tastes, but based on the pretty limited film repertoire of some of the folks on this board, I don't care all that much, and after all the title did ask "In my mind".
Oh, and THX 1138 is GL attempting to BE Kubrick.