Back to the Future Part II

Does anyone know if the one in the movie is a .357 or a .38? If I am going to get one I would certainly like the correct one.
 
That is the accurate fax paper. In the movie there are no side holes, yet it is visible to see that they were ripped off.
 
Is this the accurate fax paper? Should it be with or without the side holes?

It's the correct kind of paper (continuous paper), but on screen you cannot see those holes. So it's your own decision, if you prefer it displayed with or without the side strips. Your printed picture is not so accurate. Last year I made a more accurate version: http://www.therpf.com/f40/back-future-67267/index40.html#post2204008

It seems your paper sheets are A4 size. The correct sheets should be US-Letter.


That is the accurate fax paper. In the movie there are no side holes, yet it is visible to see that they were ripped off.

It IS clearly visible in several scenes (on Blu-ray). And it's not fax paper. It's continuous paper for dot-matrix printers. ;)

back-future-part-ii-cusco_fax_2.jpg-246615d1382721275
 

Attachments

  • Cusco_Fax_2.jpg
    Cusco_Fax_2.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 1,000
Last edited:
That is the accurate fax paper. In the movie there are no side holes, yet it is visible to see that they were ripped off.

It IS clearly visible in several scenes (on Blu-ray). And it's not fax paper. It's continuous paper for dot-matrix printers. ;)

Yes, I agree.

On another note, I have a TON of continuous paper if anyone needs any. Just pay postage.
 
This is my version.

back-future-part-ii-cusco_preview4.jpg-246622d1382722505



But I didn't use continuous paper. I printed my A3-version on A3 paper sheets and used a perforating knife to trim it to US-Letter (8.5 x 11 inches).

back-future-part-ii-cusco_preview5.jpg-246623d13827225075



The knife did its job very good. :)

back-future-part-ii-cusco_preview6.jpg-246624d1382722508
 

Attachments

  • cusco_preview4.jpg
    cusco_preview4.jpg
    90.4 KB · Views: 998
  • cusco_preview5.jpg
    cusco_preview5.jpg
    55.3 KB · Views: 995
  • cusco_preview6.jpg
    cusco_preview6.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 996
Thanks guys for your replies
Actually that was my doubt: I had seen the sheet with holes for sale on Profiles in History and on the screenshot you have a sheet without holes. Guess I'll print one with holes and another one with the holes ripped
Thanks formula for the information on the continuos paper you have
Thanks (again) Roland for pointing me on the right direction. I'll reprint it according to your files. So, being the A4 size 21cm x 29.7cm and the US letter 21.6 x 27.9cm, and not paying much attention to the 6mm on the sides I can cut an A4 sheet about 1 or 1,5cm at the bottom and have a more or less accurate size prop sheet :D
 
Ok - corrections made! Printed it with and without the side holes using Roland's file (not 100% Us letter but close: 21cm x 28cm)
Thanks guys

FAX1.jpg FAX2.jpg FAX3.jpg FAX4.jpg

FAX1A.jpg FAX2A.jpg FAX3A.jpg FAX4A.jpg
 
Here is something new for you: one of Biff's office photos. As usual, I made two versions, one in US-Letter and one in A4 size. The size of the photo itself is 7.5 x 9.5 inches. All you need now, is a golden frame of 9.5 x 11.5 inches (frame molding: 1 inch). One like this:

back-future-part-ii-9856_2.jpg-255922d1384591068


back-future-part-ii-biffs_office_photo_frame1.jpg-255925d1384591572



And here are the PDF files:

US-Letter: Biffs_Office_Photo_US-Letter.pdf
A4: Biffs_Office_Photo_A4.pdf

Preview pic:

back-future-part-ii-biffs_office_photo_preview.jpg-255924d1384591258
 

Attachments

  • 9856_2.jpg
    9856_2.jpg
    48.7 KB · Views: 866
  • biffs_office_photo_preview.jpg
    biffs_office_photo_preview.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 889
  • biffs_office_photo_frame1.jpg
    biffs_office_photo_frame1.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 866
Last edited:
Back
Top