ANH-Star Destroyer

Apologies for asking this in a different build thread mate, but I’m just wondering what happened with your total rebuild of the Deago MF ? Did you end up installing those incredibly insane lights for it’s engine ? Where can I find pics of that beautiful build ? This new build is a great resource too, thanks for sharing.

Ged
Only pics I have up for it are in the old build thread. Yeah I have all the lights still but I need to install them. I got all the archive X paints a while back to paint it, gonna try to get to that end of this year:p

 
Something else that is important to understand about the geometry of this ship is that they built it to have a bit of forced perspective in the model, so that when they shot it coming towards the camera it looks really huge! So if you look at the middle trench from a side view of the ship its actually smaller at the back and larger at the front. My first thought was that the trench wall was just make taller in the front than the back, but its not, its a consistent 1" all the way down the side of the ship, the illusion comes from making the trench walls deeper in the back than the front, which allows the top and bottom hull sheets to hang over the edge further and create the tapering effect.

Here is an exaggerated sketch to show what I mean. The inner triangle is the side walls and the red is the top/bottom hull sheets.

You can see the effect in the final model in these pics, the side shot makes it pretty clear, but even in the 3/4 front shot you can see the effect as the image was clearly taken with a longer lens (loosk to be somewhere around 75-100mmish which minimizes the amount of perspective you would normally see in a shorter 10-40mm lens. But you can clearly see how pronounced the perspective of the side trench is even with the rest of the ship relatively flattened out. by the long lens used to take this photo.

You can kind of see it in the bulid pic from ILM if you know what you are looking for, it's not a huge amount either, i'll measure mine later and post back here the actual difference.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4062.JPG
    IMG_4062.JPG
    68.6 KB · Views: 239
  • SideTrench.jpg
    SideTrench.jpg
    143 KB · Views: 245
  • SideTrench001.jpg
    SideTrench001.jpg
    129.2 KB · Views: 244
  • SideTrench002.jpg
    SideTrench002.jpg
    247.8 KB · Views: 264
Earlier in this thread I posted some tests comparing Tamiya Insignia white (AS-20) to ArchiveX reefer white, they seemed pretty close…until I actually shot them side by side- ewww, very different colors…
Left IW, Right RW
Top is over white and bottom is over black…

Guess I’m back to trying to source 20 gallons of reefer white haha
 

Attachments

  • C2851D90-48EF-4862-AD7E-8DD8868E723A.jpeg
    C2851D90-48EF-4862-AD7E-8DD8868E723A.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 139
Earlier in this thread I posted some tests comparing Tamiya Insignia white (AS-20) to ArchiveX reefer white, they seemed pretty close…until I actually shot them side by side- ewww, very different colors…
Left IW, Right RW
Top is over white and bottom is over black…

Guess I’m back to trying to source 20 gallons of reefer white haha
That's sooo useful information.
Thanks for the comparison pic!
 
This may be helpful based on t2sides SS 5' Falcon.


Though I'm not really sure how different the Star Destroyer is to the base coat of the Falcon.
Obviously the subsequent weathering and washes dirty down the falcon to shades of grey.
 
Something else that is important to understand about the geometry of this ship is that they built it to have a bit of forced perspective in the model, so that when they shot it coming towards the camera it looks really huge! So if you look at the middle trench from a side view of the ship its actually smaller at the back and larger at the front. My first thought was that the trench wall was just make taller in the front than the back, but its not, its a consistent 1" all the way down the side of the ship, the illusion comes from making the trench walls deeper in the back than the front, which allows the top and bottom hull sheets to hang over the edge further and create the tapering effect.

Here is an exaggerated sketch to show what I mean. The inner triangle is the side walls and the red is the top/bottom hull sheets.

You can see the effect in the final model in these pics, the side shot makes it pretty clear, but even in the 3/4 front shot you can see the effect as the image was clearly taken with a longer lens (loosk to be somewhere around 75-100mmish which minimizes the amount of perspective you would normally see in a shorter 10-40mm lens. But you can clearly see how pronounced the perspective of the side trench is even with the rest of the ship relatively flattened out. by the long lens used to take this photo.

You can kind of see it in the bulid pic from ILM if you know what you are looking for, it's not a huge amount either, i'll measure mine later and post back here the actual difference.
Absolutely!
 
Think I have the color sorted out. Was able to get a local paint chain to color match a swatch of reefer white in an acrylic matte finish. It’s super close, I’m pretty pleased with the result, thinned down it shoots pretty nice through the brush, gonna paint a few more test pieces with it to be sure but so far it’s promising! The marched color is on the top resin parts cast I’m holding.
AX reefer white on the bottom side trench wall.
A did one with doors down and one with doors up to let some sun in and get some different lighting scenarios.
 

Attachments

  • C862785F-E3A0-4D5D-BFF2-9F5683FEFF6F.jpeg
    C862785F-E3A0-4D5D-BFF2-9F5683FEFF6F.jpeg
    3.5 MB · Views: 265
  • 2C9378FD-2852-404E-A4C9-36E59E50A40A.jpeg
    2C9378FD-2852-404E-A4C9-36E59E50A40A.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 263
So I built out this Legg’s shell with the plan to mold and cast the engine bells in resin. BUT- I got a hold of this 3D resin printer and just modeled and printed them out! I mean- pffft resin is resin right?!! Plus I was able to design a pedestal that is the same diameter as my acrylic engine tubes so they fit in nice and sung- and straight!
 

Attachments

  • 5BF0F246-2B53-4914-BF29-8D7571524771.jpeg
    5BF0F246-2B53-4914-BF29-8D7571524771.jpeg
    3.4 MB · Views: 177
  • 7ED8B9B9-F751-4D5D-9373-F66CCB00B26B.jpeg
    7ED8B9B9-F751-4D5D-9373-F66CCB00B26B.jpeg
    3.4 MB · Views: 154
  • AACB9704-2EC1-4768-82B6-8BA08C07BD3A.jpeg
    AACB9704-2EC1-4768-82B6-8BA08C07BD3A.jpeg
    3.5 MB · Views: 155
  • 6562A07E-B238-4DFF-A6C4-DF91C6469C90.jpeg
    6562A07E-B238-4DFF-A6C4-DF91C6469C90.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 155
  • 6F5F3002-3820-4F91-ACB8-FC4369D5CA1F.jpeg
    6F5F3002-3820-4F91-ACB8-FC4369D5CA1F.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 161
  • EE48E0A4-DB3D-4388-AAA3-BCED47BEA491.jpeg
    EE48E0A4-DB3D-4388-AAA3-BCED47BEA491.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 152
  • B4F2A9BA-7F82-4647-AD7C-796A07207951.jpeg
    B4F2A9BA-7F82-4647-AD7C-796A07207951.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 140
  • BF17C87A-E03A-4214-BBC1-B7217B958398.jpeg
    BF17C87A-E03A-4214-BBC1-B7217B958398.jpeg
    3.4 MB · Views: 141
  • FE640202-AE5D-4CF5-A51E-A6E2644B728C.jpeg
    FE640202-AE5D-4CF5-A51E-A6E2644B728C.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 193
So I built out this Legg’s shell with the plan to mold and cast the engine bells in resin. BUT- I got a hold of this 3D resin printer and just modeled and printed them out! I mean- pffft resin is resin right?!! Plus I was able to design a pedestal that is the same diameter as my acrylic engine tubes so they fit in nice and sung- and straight!
Resin is Resin, indeed.
Plus, with 3D printing you avoid potential shrinkage issues.
Looking great!
 
I decided to re print these with the rings attached to the end, didn’t want to fuss with trying to build those out as they are really thin and get the to line up perfectly with inner surface of those T strips. The base cylinders are built out of acyclovir tubing with styrene strips glued around them to create the relief plating. I was able to print a disk on the base of the engine bells that snuggly fit inside the tubes perfect, so it’s keeps them lined up in the tubes really nice and straight. Worked out really well. I’ll glue the outer T strips and other little panels and end detail flaps on later.
 

Attachments

  • C3EEC59D-EC26-477D-A0CB-8AC1CF09C057.jpeg
    C3EEC59D-EC26-477D-A0CB-8AC1CF09C057.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 114
  • C0C949FB-62A4-4882-97AC-98C67D195315.jpeg
    C0C949FB-62A4-4882-97AC-98C67D195315.jpeg
    2.7 MB · Views: 124
  • 39853933-818C-486E-8F25-3BE4A215F986.jpeg
    39853933-818C-486E-8F25-3BE4A215F986.jpeg
    2.2 MB · Views: 113
  • 8F1FC819-F232-45FB-B106-552C10D321F4.jpeg
    8F1FC819-F232-45FB-B106-552C10D321F4.jpeg
    2.4 MB · Views: 119
I scratch built in the exterior T strips and little chips that connect them at the top to keep the outer surfaces more built looking and not so perfectly computer printed which to me is the magic of these old studio models. I’m being very conscious about that as I now decide what to print vs build. I’m thinking you need to blend the 2 together like this to get the benefits of both. At least that is where my brain is at as of today! The journey continues :p
I’d be curious to hear others thoughts on this - bad or good! I think that dialogue and thought melding is important!
 

Attachments

  • B48906C4-58A5-48AA-B640-0E1EB6B6A235.jpeg
    B48906C4-58A5-48AA-B640-0E1EB6B6A235.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 117
  • B5333F67-787C-4454-B42C-2A2505ABE7D2.jpeg
    B5333F67-787C-4454-B42C-2A2505ABE7D2.jpeg
    2.6 MB · Views: 118
Looking very nice! I like (and use myself) this same 'composite' technique, blending printed parts with donor-greeblie- and styrene-detailed additions to make it pop.

Loving your build and the documentation so far - thanks for sharing!

Dan
 
Ktaylor, I think that is a great approach to using both new and original techniques to have the benefits of both worlds.
I think that's possibly where a lot of the 3D kits with fully complete detailed assemblies fail to impress as much as something cobbled together.

Your parts are looking fantastic!
 
I scratch built in the exterior T strips and little chips that connect them at the top to keep the outer surfaces more built looking and not so perfectly computer printed which to me is the magic of these old studio models. I’m being very conscious about that as I now decide what to print vs build. I’m thinking you need to blend the 2 together like this to get the benefits of both. At least that is where my brain is at as of today! The journey continues :p
I’d be curious to hear others thoughts on this - bad or good! I think that dialogue and thought melding is important!
I'd be curious as to the strength and heat resistance of cast resin and printed. I want to get a resin printer myself. I've only used my Ender 3. And I know from personal experience that pla parts will deform in a hot car. Switching to abs because of that. I don't know how you'd test the strength difference. But if it can support its own weight and take any heat from lights, I say goody. Led lights are bright enough and cool, so no problem there. The only other difference would be cost. Silicone and resin ain't cheap, so printed parts may win that issue too. No vacuum pumps and pressure pots. I'm talking myself into that Elegoo Saturn S , LOL..
 
You’re going great guns Kris !. My 0.02 worth regarding your last post, if the folks at ILM had the tech that we’re fortunate enough to have today, then they’d have been all over ( and then some ) utilising/modifying and exploiting it for results only they could have imagined.
What you’re trying to achieve is terrific, and what you’v shared so far is much appreciated.
 
I'd be curious as to the strength and heat resistance of cast resin and printed. I want to get a resin printer myself. I've only used my Ender 3. And I know from personal experience that pla parts will deform in a hot car. Switching to abs because of that. I don't know how you'd test the strength difference. But if it can support its own weight and take any heat from lights, I say goody. Led lights are bright enough and cool, so no problem there. The only other difference would be cost. Silicone and resin ain't cheap, so printed parts may win that issue too. No vacuum pumps and pressure pots. I'm talking myself into that Elegoo Saturn S , LOL..
Yeah I’m not sure, I know smooth on makes a casing resin that can withstand pretty high temps. But yeah I’ll be using LED so I didn’t really look into much more. There is some “tough” resin I’m about to buy and print with, seems like it really helps with thin parts so they don’t break. This stuff I have now is really strong once cured, honesty it snaps and breaks with the same feel as my smooth on casting resin.
 
Last edited:
Finally got the engine mount design sorted. Tools a few prints to get the fit tolerance dialed in but they slide on snug and tight now, easy to remove them and get into the wiring and bulbs later on.

Have been doing a lot of part print tests as well will list a few pics here of where I’m at. So far so good.
 

Attachments

  • B738B0A9-EABB-4A24-9B6A-505965AC86D6.jpeg
    B738B0A9-EABB-4A24-9B6A-505965AC86D6.jpeg
    3.7 MB · Views: 178
  • 9E057530-1616-4F0C-A4E9-AE811015F1CE.jpeg
    9E057530-1616-4F0C-A4E9-AE811015F1CE.jpeg
    3.7 MB · Views: 173
  • 543A7E9C-3B4B-4920-B1B3-911343FCA64C.jpeg
    543A7E9C-3B4B-4920-B1B3-911343FCA64C.jpeg
    3.7 MB · Views: 151
  • D3B05873-FA6A-4E25-9541-7CEF4A56846C.jpeg
    D3B05873-FA6A-4E25-9541-7CEF4A56846C.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 164
  • 0BE566EA-8AD7-4AF6-AD04-A22AA5F162CF.jpeg
    0BE566EA-8AD7-4AF6-AD04-A22AA5F162CF.jpeg
    2.2 MB · Views: 148
  • 25BA1579-A969-4B9C-85B8-7EE59657807F.jpeg
    25BA1579-A969-4B9C-85B8-7EE59657807F.jpeg
    2.3 MB · Views: 141
  • DC9113AC-D308-4473-A1B8-D1CB28F69983.jpeg
    DC9113AC-D308-4473-A1B8-D1CB28F69983.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 192
Some part prints. Took a couple tries of 3D modeling the part/print it, compare it to the kit part..tweak…repeat but they are really dialed in now.
 

Attachments

  • 2BC8B274-62C9-4152-83D7-DEA6B6C8077B.jpeg
    2BC8B274-62C9-4152-83D7-DEA6B6C8077B.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 145
  • 25F57187-F888-48D4-A4C0-E4655F0DA76B.jpeg
    25F57187-F888-48D4-A4C0-E4655F0DA76B.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 153

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

If you wish to reply despite these issues, check the box below before replying.
Be aware that malicious compliance may result in more severe penalties.
Back
Top