That is new information that I have never heard before, or seen.Wait, what? Making sure I got this right. The Greg Jein Hero phaser has a.....duplicate?
I wanted to duplicate some of those exam photos but I had little after it was finished. I did manage this one.
View attachment 1467000 View attachment 1467001
I know nothink!OK, Rob,
I now demand proof that you are not the builder of this newly discovered hero phaser.
I mean, I know that build quality of this newly discovered hero is really not quite up to your standards, but I could see you blindfolding yourself and accomplishing that build using just your non-dominant hand.
Not gatekeeping, and that James I find is a bit much. Establishing that Robn1 does indeed live up to his word and claims is quite clear. And the only one thus far to do so. Nice crisp (meaing with sharp corners and clear delineation and no, not "Crispy", extra or other slangly.)Sorry, I'm not going to "relate" anything to anyone. I get paid well to that in real life, and believe it or not, I come on here for "fun".
Your delivery is exactly why you have been received poorly, I'm sorry to say, and you have returned in kind.
At no point has there been any sort of official opinion, party line, or groupthink, as far as I can tell. People have been offering their opinion, based on their understanding of the facts. Unless I missed something, I haven't seen any facts from you. Feel free to correct me if you have, it's been a long thread.
Now, your attempt at gatekeeping by saying only those who have made props can comment is frankly a pretty ridiculous standard. So only people who have recreated a phaser to a particular standard should be allowed to even ask questions? That's ridiculous!
If that's the case, show your phaser. You don't need to show all the details, pull out just enough to win.
Good reference Robn1.I know nothink!
View attachment 1467002
Wait, what? Making sure I got this right. The Greg Jein Hero phaser has a.....duplicate?
Exactly what I am saying. Kiddie stuff.
If you'd like Robn, we can discuss what I see in a one on one. At this level, it is a matter of one's interpretation.I wanted to duplicate some of those exam photos but I had little after it was finished. I did manage this one.
View attachment 1467000 View attachment 1467001
Honestly, I still have no idea who you are, what you do, or anything else. I've seen a website with some pretty impressive HO Guage stuff, but that's it. None of that relates to the subject at hand, the phaser.Not gatekeeping, and that James I find is a bit much. Establishing that Robn1 does indeed live up to his word and claims is quite clear. And the only one thus far to do so. Nice crisp (meaing with sharp corners and clear delineation and no, not "Crispy", extra or other slangly.)
An other person shows a common 3D printer and hasn't mentioned the source of his surface contours, or any reference to experience with Non-Rationalized Baseline Splines, STL or IGES files. etc.
As for the rest on here as demonstrated by the all too common sophomoric name calling, images and GIFs, kindly spare me? By that measure of behavior, they know little and do act rashly. It is offensive to anyone looking in and makes the bunch of you look childish.
As I am apparently constantly being forced to defend myself with every comment regarding the plainly obvious "Group Think" you deny seeing, it is clearly there. And whether or not you are a fair arbiter, I cannot say. All I have said is the object in question is an original Hero Phaser regardless of the majority on here's opinions. I am privy to the proof determined by experts. I have shared some of it, but have been asked to keep the rest to myself, and yet you all still resoundingly say: "NO!"
What is a person to do?
Nothing sad about owning a Wand, for the price they are fantastic.Wait, they had rattle cans in the olden days?
Jokes aside, that looks great. Sadly, my best TOS phaser is the Wand Co version. Years ago, I was on a list for a fiberglass kit from someone that's posted in this thread but I for reasons of timing, I missed out...not that mine would have come out looking that million dollar example.
Agreed. I treasure my Wand phaser.Nothing sad about owning a Wand, for the price they are fantastic.
I am not posting 3D files. Get real. These are screen shots, it will have to suffice. I included something from a favourite sci-fi movie of mine.An other person shows a common 3D printer and hasn't mentioned the source of his surface contours, or any reference to experience with Non-Rationalized Baseline Splines, STL or IGES files. etc.
What old school shade tree ??? is that supposed to be? Have you done anything relevant? anything not from the bronze age?How about this: .016" two sided photo-etched half-hard phoshor-bronze. Are you still laughing?
So what you are saying that you do with regarding shaping anything, without an already provided surface, you generate your own by use of NURBS. Is that correct?View attachment 1466994
Now who's posting gratuitous envy pics? I tried to figure out Blender once, but all I could make was a straight line. It was a very nice, very straight line, but was as far as I could get.I am not posting 3D files. Get real. These are screen shots, it will have to suffice. I included something from a favourite sci-fi movie of mine.
View attachment 1467015View attachment 1467017
View attachment 1467027
I appreciate that but futzing around in Fusion pales by comparison to the work of art you created. Seriously, those shells are a work of art.Now who's posting gratuitous envy pics? I tried to figure out Blender once, but all I could make was a straight line. It was a very nice, very straight line, but was as far as I could get.
I've been researching what you describe as " two sided photo-etched half-hard phoshor-bronze" and what I've come up with doesn't look like the image you posted nor does the application for this process. The closest I can find that does look like this again, doesn't fit the application unless your making prop microwave ovens or military equipment.How about this: .016" two sided photo-etched half-hard phoshor-bronze. Are you still laughing?
So what you are saying that you do with regarding shaping anything, without an already provided surface, you generate your own by use of NURBS. Is that correct?View attachment 1466994
I've been researching what you describe as " two sided photo-etched half-hard phoshor-bronze" and what I've come up with doesn't look like the image you posted nor does the application for this process. The closest I can find that does look like this again, doesn't fit the application unless your making prop microwave ovens or military equipment.
Please enlighten me.
I suspected, but wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something. There is a process using etching and bronze sheets like the image he posted but it has an industrial application. Not the best or most advantageous choice for a one-off prop. I've never made a board in this manner before though I have seen them. It was the best and probably only viable method to use prior to 20 years ago for one-off boards. There is now a machine that creates PCB in a similar way to a 3D printer. It's called the Voltera I think. I nearly got one but the early design had some drawbacks.He's just talking about common photo etch. Don't know why he specifies phosphor bronze, it's usually just common brass, unless he needs it for a specific purpose. Don't know why the emphasis on two sided either, it's pretty much the standard for a good etch. Pop over to the scale modelling or studio scale sub-forums, they use it quite often, either from off the shelf kits or on a DIY basis. People use it for amateur circuits as well.
I'm sure I've invited myself a fun response now.
What old school shade tree ??? is that supposed to be? Have you done anything relevant? anything not from the bronze age?
It would look like this, on silk screened PCB assembled by a pick 'n place machine and looking like it came from your Playstation rather than a prop. I blacked out a few details, sorry.
View attachment 1467029
I know your post is mostly tongue in cheek though I’m sure many see Highliner‘s posts just that way.I know, I know...I shouldn't get involved, but I'm out of Popcorn So; reading this interesting thread (and knowing ZIP about ST phasers), it seems that Highliners made those phasers himself, concocted a story about their provenance and is, now, trying to defend those as "real-as-they-can-be" with tooth and nails. Nah! Just kidding I'm playing Devil's Advocate
Wow, you think I'm that good do you? (lol)I know, I know...I shouldn't get involved, but I'm out of Popcorn So; reading this interesting thread (and knowing ZIP about ST phasers), it seems that Highliners made those phasers himself, concocted a story about their provenance and is, now, trying to defend those as "real-as-they-can-be" with tooth and nails. Nah! Just kidding I'm playing Devil's Advocate
Because of its elongation characteristics compared with brass or 302 half hard stainless steel. two step is not "pretty much standard" as it is up tp customer specifications and supplied art work as to whether one, two, three, or even four stepped etchings. But (he says with tongue firmly planted in cheek) you already knew that.He's just talking about common photo etch. Don't know why he specifies phosphor bronze, it's usually just common brass, unless he needs it for a specific purpose. Don't know why the emphasis on two sided either, it's pretty much the standard for a good etch. Pop over to the scale modelling or studio scale sub-forums, they use it quite often, either from off the shelf kits or on a DIY basis. People use it for amateur circuits as well.
I'm sure I've invited myself a fun response now.
He's just talking about common photo etch. Don't know why he specifies phosphor bronze, it's usually just common brass, unless he needs it for a specific purpose. Don't know why the emphasis on two sided either, it's pretty much the standard for a good etch. Pop over to the scale modelling or studio scale sub-forums, they use it quite often, either from off the shelf kits or on a DIY basis. People use it for amateur circuits as well.
I'm sure I've invited myself a fun response now.
Yeah right! Why make it about the guy questioning the professed skills of the few on here to correctly give an opinion about something about to sell at auction for possibly 7 figures and where we can seriously impact and curb it's sale's potential? " Yeah! Let's all just gang up on him"... or are you all that much in denial abnout what you are doing?Dude, why are we validating the rude guy by playing defense? It just makes him look important and makes the thread about him.
Not picking on you specifically, yours was just the most recent post.